Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 I have added the collage of two similar looking men to that of Bookhout and Ruby to demonstrate a point about the JFK community. The two men I added look more alike than Bookhout and Ruby. With Bookhout and Ruby, it jumps out at you right away that they are two different men. With the other two, the likenesses between them jump out more than the differences. But, we all know that, except for identical twins, every individual is a genetic oddity. Though those two men look alike, they are definitely two different men.

It's just as certain between Bookhout and Ruby. We don't see as much of them, but what we do see is enough. One has a very short, burly neck; the other has a longer, more typically proportioned neck. Boom! That's it! You know they are different men.

However, the difference is that no one has a stake in the two other men, as they do in Bookhout vs. Ruby. Many JFKers WANT Bookhout to be Ruby, and they are willing to forego the normal visual discernment that tells them that they are different men. There is absolutely no basis to claim that Bookhout and Ruby even look alike. There is as much difference between them as there usually is between two men who have no genetic connection. And yet, JFKers insist on claiming that Bookhout is Ruby because they are already very comfortable with. and possessive about, the paradigm they have that Ruby shot Oswald. So, it is lunacy born of stubbornness.

And to me, it is pathognomonic of the deep level of intellectual corruption that exists in the JFK world. It also makes me realize that a fresh approach is needed.