Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 The fact is that when we see variance between Ruby and the Shooter, such as that the Shooter had a short neck, while Ruby had a longer neck; Ruby had tapered hair and a scruffy neck, while the Shooter had untapered hair that ended abruptly and with a clean neck below the long hair, it is absolutely certain that they were not the same man.

There is nothing else you can say that will negate this or overrule it. There is nothing else you can point to and say that this doesn't matter because of that. It comes down to being honest and mature as a thinker. In fact, when we look at these two side by side, we can see instantly that they were different men. We know it intuitively just from having looked at people our whole lives. On the left, it's the impression of a short man (you can see how much shorter he was than Graves who was average height) with a short neck and a lot of thick, baggy burliness to him. while on the right, Jack Ruby doesn't have that stuffed baggy look. His hair is tapered in back, but even his neck looks tapered compared to the Shooter's. On the Shooter, it looks like his head is resting on his shoulders with very little neck. And his hair is so long in back that it is curling under at the lowest poiint. It is nothing whatsoever like Ruby's.

These two men are as unlike as any two men you can name. There is absolutely no chance that the are the same man. And it is Checkmate. It means that we can state, categorically, that Jack Ruby was not the Garage Shooter of Lee Harvey Oswald.

It's over. It's settled. Ruby was not the one performing in that Spectdacle. And yes, people have the ability to hit any keys on their keyboards, and they will defiantly deny it. But, the very act of doing that in the face of this is sheer corruption. It's the evil that pervades the world of JFK.