Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

"Like with the Altgens6 photograph going on the Associated Press news wire by 1:03 p.m. CST and before any time could have been allotted for altering that photograph, it's really waste of time talking about what could have been done to the photgraph at a later time for the window of opportunity was closed when the photo was shown publicly."

I don't know how many times Larry Peters made comments like the one above, but it was a lot. You would think that, at least once, he would have cited the proof that Altgens6 was wired at 1:03. But, he never did. He never even took a stab at it. 

There is only the claim that Altgens6 was wired at 1:03. There isn't a stitch of evidence. For the first time in 51 years, somebody came up with this:

Supposedly, DN2 refers to Altgens6, but what is this? It's a strip of paper with some typing on it which was taped or glued to the bottom of  the Altgens6 photo. Anyone could have done this. Anyone could have made this. There isn't the slightest authentication for this. 

But get this: not even this fake thing was on the radar when Larry Peters made his statements. What was he basing it on? Nothing. Just the repeated claim that Altgens6 was wired out at 1:03. That was 2004, and no one then was brandishing any relics from 11/22/63 which proved it. It was based on nothing. Absolutely nothing.

Altgens6 was NOT wired out at 1:03. It was shown to the nation for the first time at 6:30 PM that evening, which allowed 5 hours for alterations. That is the indisputable truth.