Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

In this video, you can hear Will Fritz say that Oswald "started for the picture show, where he encountered the officer that he killed." 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-LrxdQbJog&feature=emb_logo 

I don't think he meant that Oswald killed the Officer in the theater. I think he meant that he killed the officer on the way to the theater.

However, I definitely think it implies that Oswald was going to the theater, that that was his destination, and I don't see how anyone could take it any other way. 

Yet, when you look at the map, it doesn't make sense because if Oswald was heading to the theater, he would have walked down Beckley to Jefferson and turned right.

The T designates 10th and Patton, where Tippit was shot. The A desgnates the alley nearby, which was used by the cops that showed up. And the X shows where another map got it wrong. But, as you can see, the T is nowhere near the route that Oswald would have taken had he been going to the theater. 

This is important because, as far as I know, none of the written reports say anything about what Oswald said about how he got to the theater. And another thing that's important is that Fritz' statement implies that Oswald walked to the theater. Obviously, if Oswald said he was driven there, and Fritz left that out, it would be duplicitous. 

But obviously, even if you are going to accept the official story, you have to believe that Oswald was heading somewhere else. So, where was he headed?

I did a Google search of that because I always like to see what's being spewed. 

This is from Slate magazine, an dthey say that Oswald was in an "aimless walk." They suggest he was "in a daze." 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2013/11/lee-harvey-oswalds-final-steps-where-jfks-killer-walked-after-the-shooting.html 

That is incredible. When have the actions of a criminal ever been attributed to an "aimless walk"? 

On History.com, they quote Professor John McAdams who said essentially the same thing, that Oswald was "improvising."" He was just walking around Oak Cliff trying to decide what to do before the police caught him." 

What an idiot McAdams is. It's a sad thing to realize that his feeble mind was directing college students. Really, what a pin head. 

That same article quotes Gerald Posner and Max Holland, who both cite David Belin, who suggested that Oswald was heading to Mexico because he had just enough money in his pocket to buy a ticket. Belin said that Oswald was just 4 blocks away from picking up the Route 55 bus which would have taken him to Lancaster Avenue where he could have boarded a southbound Greyhound bus, which after several connections, could have taken hiim to Monterrey, Mexico, and from there the long ride south to Mexico City. 

So, just think: on the basis of finding a circuitous bus route that could have taken him to Mexico City, and note that there were circuitous bus routes that could have taken him anywhere in North, Central, or South America, Belin was willing to attribute that to Oswald. The irony is that Oswald never even went to Mexico City the first time, never mind an entirely imagined second time.  

https://www.history.com/news/lee-harvey-oswald-plan-chaos-or-conspiracy

Note that most narratives just glass over what Oswald was doing at 10th and Patton. They don't try to explain it. They just ignore it, like the 9/11 Commission ignoring the collapse of Building 7.