Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 If the back shot was just a bullet, why shoot him on the right side of his back? Why not shoot him on the left side of his back, where his heart was? Or why not shoot him in the head? Shooting him on the right side of his back made no sense, unless they were trying to avoid killing him.  And think about when the back shot occurred. It occurred early. It wasn't after the throat shot. That is ridiculous. If it were after the throat shot, then we would see it go down in the Zapruder film, after 225. Of course, the official story is that the back shot and the throat shot were one, and it happened behind the sign. But, if you know they weren't one shot, then don't assume they happened close together either. They did not. The back shot happened high on the hill, soon after the limo completed the turn from Houston. So, why don't we see it in the Zapruder film? Because: it was massively altered to hide it. But, there are still traces of it there. Look at frame 205.

He isn't waving. His hand is covering his face, but he didn't do that. And look at Jackie. She is turned looking at him. Why isn't she engaged with the spectators? Why is her focus on him? It's because she knows something is wrong with him. In her WC testimony, she said that the first she knew something was wrong was when she saw a "quizzical" look on his face. Well, this is her seeing the quizzical look on his face, which they covered up with his bogus hand. He was already shot in the back there. I think he was shot about 190, but they removed so many frames, you can't go by the numbers at all. JFK isn't waving in the three photos: Croft, Betzner, and Willis. It's because he was already shot in the back. He was shot right before Croft. 

So, what was the purpose in shooting JFK on the non-lethal right side of his back high on the hill? And if it was a metal bullet, how did it stop so fast? From flight speed to stillness in an inch and a half? There isn't even a word for that span of time. If I said it was "instantaneous," even that isn't fast enough. There is no word that captures the speed that it happened.