The Wizard has started 2017 with a big find and a mystery solved. It turns out that the Beers photo that we thought was uncropped was slightly cropped. And it shows that there were two corners on that left side.

So, on top is the version that we usually see, and below it is the one that shows the second corner. And indeed, the outermost cop in the lineup is standing adjacent to the second corner, as in Jackson.

So, above is Beers and beneath it is Jackson, and what it shows is that entire recessed area got cut out of Jackson by the parallax effect. I tell you though, it's still difficult for me to be OK with this. Look at the relative position of these two guys.

So, they appear lined up with each other along that wall in Beers but are far askew in Jackson? But, here's an even bigger problem: Look at the big tall towering guy in Beers:

With his towering height, shouldn't we see him in Jackson? But, we don't. And, as the Wizard himself said, the discrepancies on the other side of the two photos remain, with Blackie Harrison looming large in the Jackson photo (and for some reason extending his long gorilla arm into the fray) while in Beers, he is reduced to a distant partial image of his face, and he's not doing anything- not smoking, not reaching, etc. Also, in Beers, you've got the guy in the light trench coat who looms large in the position that Blackie is in in Jackson. So, you can't rectify these problems, and it remains absolutely impossible for these two photos to have been taken .6 second apart in time. I thank the Wizard for his excellent work. 

It's New Year's Day, a time to be happy; about choosing to be happy and and having a positive outlook. I know it's hard for some people this time around because they are worried about Trump being in charge, but hey, it's not like we're going to run out of food. So, ever the helpful one, I decided to find a song to lift people's spirits. And, the song I settled on is a real gem: Put On A Happy Face by the great Charles Strouse. 

I already did a song of his, Once Upon A Time, which I think is one of the prettiest songs ever written. Well, this song is very nice too, and its title has become an adage. It was written for the 1960 Broadway musical Bye Bye Birdie, and it was first sung and danced to by Dick Van Dyke. But, stylistically, it's more like a song from the 1940s, and maybe even the 1920s, which is probably why I like it.  And, its witty lyrics by Lee Adams deliver the cheer-up message perfectly. 

So, here is my rendition of Put On A Happy Face with my very best wishes to you, and the JFK truth movement, for a great year in 2017. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PcaS0frOB0&feature=youtu.be

Posted by Todd Fisher, brother of Carrie Fisher and son of Debbie Reynolds. In case there is someone who does not recognize the expression, it's a lyric from Singin' in the Rain, which starred Debbie Reynolds, hence her outfit.  

Today, I received this letter from OIC Chairman Larry Rivera, which summarizes his JFK research activities in 2016. It was a busy and productive year for him. 

Hi Ralph.  It seemed that this year we were finding out new things almost on a weekly basis.  Even though the Oswald overlays were important last year (we first published this at the end of October 2015), the Lovelady overlays were even more compelling because even if we remove Lee from consideration as Doorman, these overlays identified conclusively that Black Hole Man is Lovelady, therefore he cannot have been Doorman.  

Next, I would have to mention the chicanery of Kenneth Brooten and Robert Groden in their trip to Aurora Co. November 13, 1976 to "identify" Lovelady, but where they failed to show Lovelady the Altgens6 and were only intent on converting him into the individual in the plaid shirt seen in front of the TSBD in the John Martin film.  In the process, according to handwriting expert Kim Johnsen, falsifying BNL's signature on the back of the Martin photo, (taken from a frame of the film which was grossly underexposed), AND failing to follow up on Lovelady's statement that Lee "could have" been in the doorway with him. All of this born out of the HSCA recording posted by Denis Morrisette on youtube, the existence of which I mention in chapter 7 of my book, which once obtained, was processed digitally to enhance its quality, allowing Gary and I to transcribe it a few months ago.  I do consider this to be the biggest find of the year.  The recording also conclusively refutes the premises that Lovelady re-entered the TSBD via the front entrance, AND that he took members of the DPD upstairs to search the building.  Both of these proven to be completely  false, and stated so by Lovelady himself.    

From there, the creation of the Harper Fragment 3D model using Blender, where we can now export the 3D file to be readily 3D printed to create a 3D model in plastic, pvc, etc (or other similar material) for pathologists and MD's to study, and which confirms David Mantik's thesis of occipital-parietal origin. 

RC: Note that these are screen-grabs from the MP4 that Larry sent me of the rotating 3D model of the Harper fragment. I did this because I am unable to post a MP4 here. 

Little did the FBI know back then, that what seemed like simple, innocuous 2D photographs of the Harper Fragment, would one day be used to accurately create this 3D model.  Similarly, the 3D model of Dealey Plaza currently being worked on by my team using Blender, will prove to be invaluable in re-creating the events of November 22, 1963.  Attached are preliminary images rendered by the program.  These scenes have the sun correctly set at its position at 12:30PM, showing the directions of the shadows.  My second book will be entirely on applying Blender to the photographic evidence to create 3D models of everything related to the assassination.

And finally, I would be remiss if I did not mention the JFK Conference last month where for the first time ever, we were allowed to present the forensic overlay work on Doorman and Black Hole Man, to positively identify these individuals as Lee Oswald and Billy Lovelady, respectively.

Happy New Year.

Larry

Today I will be isolating the entrance way and placing human models generated by the 3D program makehuman, www.makehuman.org

Note that officials announced right away that the guy who looked so much like Oswald in the Altgens photo was really another TSBD employee, Billy Lovelady, who just happened to look uncannily like Oswald- so uncannily it was eerie. And, they added the stories about Lovelady's kids mistaking Oswald for their dad on television, and Lovelady's wife seeing Oswald from behind at the TSBD and thinking he was her husband. The fact that Oswald was taller and 40 pounds lighter than Lovelady didn't phase her? She still thought he was her husband, whom she slept with nightly? 

But, they did all that lip-wagging without publishing any images of Lovelady. Presumably, they could have gotten images of him from him, or they easily could have taken images of him. And, don't forget they had the film captures of Lovelady from 11/22. For instance, they could have published this:

And everyone would have seen how uncannily he looked like this:

Oh yeah, I can see that. Or, they could have published this:

Yeah, that's the spitting image of Oswald. Is it not?

And, when they finally did take photos of Lovelady, which was in late February 1964, they didn't publish those either. They didn't even announce that they took them. The only reason the world found out about those FBI photos is because of one man: Harold Weisberg. He's the one who dug them out of the document pile after the Warren Report was published. The FBI had taken them and quietly sent them to the Warren Commission, accompanied by a letter from J. Edgar Hoover.  But, they immediately got lost in the document pile- until Howard Weisberg dug them up.

Despite their best effort to concoct lookalike photos, it was no match to Oswald either.

Notice that they did slap the top of Lovelady's head on Doorman, but everything else about Doorman looks like  Oswald because he was Oswald, and Oswald and Lovelady looked nothing alike. What this is is a naked display of chicanery and lies, bloodied chicanery and lies. The cover-up of Oswald in the doorway went on for 50 ruthless years, unabated. But now, it is gone; forever gone; dead and gone; and it is never coming back. Larry Rivera has seen to that. 

The year 2016 is about to end, and I would like to reflect on our accomplishments this past year. It has been a great year for JFK truth with a lot of progress made, including important new finds. Here is a short list of what I consider the most significant developments.

1) Larry Rivera's overlays of Oswald and Doorman.

Of course, Oswald being in the doorway was well proven, in spades, before Larry did this. But, what this provides is an incomparable visual display that cinches the reality of it like nothing that has come before. And now, it is field-tested, and we know that it really works. People respond to this. This puts people over the top and into our camp. It is simply inconceivable that Oswald and Lovelady looked this much alike. They were not related. They weren't even the same body type. And the stories they told- such as Lovelady's kids seeing Oswald on tv and thinking it was their dad- are a crock-o'-shit. Never happened. Couldn't have. It's pure horse shit. But, this gif by Larry Rivera is our fail-safe. This settles it once and for all, that it was Oswald in the doorway, and as the Doorway Man, which was buried under 53 years of lies. including the ridiculous Prayer Man lie. And by the way, if you're wondering who Prayer Man really was, the answer is: nobody. The whole thing is fake. But, moving on:

2) the discovery that the Moorman photo was taken before the fatal head shot. Note that the discovery that the Moorman photo was really taken by Babushka Lady counts as a 2015 discovery. But, it was in 2016 that the common notion that the Moorman photo was taken in conjunction with Zapruder frame 315 (which was 2 frames after the fatal head shot) was blasted to smithereens.  The basis of this discovery is that in the Moorman photo, the motorcycles hadn't advanced far enough in relation to the limo. We can still see most all of the left rear wheel of the limo. Whereas, at the time of the fatal head shot, the motorcycles obscured that rear wheel. Look at it in the Muchmore film. In this frame, you can see the mist from the explosion on the right side of JFK's head, so you know the fatal head shot has occurred. Look at where the motorcycles are. Notice that you can't see the rear wheel, at least not very much of it.

Now, look at the Moorman photo, and you'll see that the bikes are still farther back, leaving most of the wheel exposed.  

The reason the bikes gained on the limo is because the limo driver Will Greer braked, and since the officers couldn't react in kind immediately, they gained on the limo. Also, notice that in the Muchmore frame that Jack and Jackie are closer together than in Moorman. That's another way we know that the Moorman photo was taken prior to the fatal head shot. The importance this has is monumental. We know that JFK's head got blown out in back and Officer Chaney reported being showered (literally soaked) with debris from Kennedy's brain. Why, therefore, does JFK's head look intact in back in the Moorman photo? It's not because they altered it. (Oh, they altered the photo and massively, but they didn't alter that.) It's because the fatal head shot hadn't happened yet. Officialdom has been falsely using the Moorman photo as evidence that there was no blowout wound in back on Kennedy. But, that is not true. There definitely was such a wound, and it came a split-second after the Moorman photo was taken. We know that now.

3) then there was the discovery that Jack Ruby did NOT shoot Oswald, that he was as innocent of the Oswald shooting as Oswald was of the Kennedy shooting. I made this discovery by myself this year, but it turned out that someone else, Maksim Irkutsk from Russia, discovered it in 2013 and put up an excellent Youtube video about it accordingly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oh3zvoj9HVc&t=2s 

Believe me, I was delighted to find out that Maxsim Irkutsk had beaten me to the punch on this by 3 years. I jumped for joy. And realize what it's based on: the fact that the little visual data we have on the Garage Shooter conflicts with Jack Ruby. 

And the very fact that there is so little visual data (that is, no view of the shooter's face) demonstrates a concerted effort to keep him out of view precisely because he was not Jack Ruby. And then, the fact that Dallas Police herded him out of the garage without stopping to cuff him first shows you that they were just trying to cover him up. There was no fighting going on. They were just doing their penguin thing. 

   
4) and then came the discovery that the real garage shooter was James Bookhout. And, it was completely separate. For many months, all I knew was that it wasn't Ruby, and I had no idea who it was. But, I started thinking about Bookhout before I had any image of him and precisely because I had no image of him. How could a guy who was following Oswald around constantly for two days not be imaged? And then, I checked Bookhout's testimony and found out that he reported being right there at the final interview but then chose not to go down and watch the jail transfer? You had reporters from all over the world there. You had half the Dallas PD there, it seems- when you look at the crowd of them backed up in the open double doors of the police building. And yet, Bookhout wasn't interested? He said he just hung around Fritz' office, but why? It wasn't his office. And he said nothing about making any communications to the FBI during that time or doing anything remotely constructive. And my first thought was that if he was there as the Garage Shooter, then of course he would say that he wasn't there at all. 

And then, I went looking for images of Bookhout, in earnest, eventually finding the yearbooks. But, I also did a search online looking for discussions about James Bookhout. I wanted to find out what others were saying about him. And I found on the Education Forum, a discussion of him, like he was a Mystery Man, with others noting the lack of any images of him. And that's when I found a post by someone who said that if you want to see an image of James Bookhout, he's in the hallway talking to Oswald in this clip. And the clip was the one that Denis Morrissette put up entitled "Oswald escorted" which Denis has since taken down, and of course I know the reason why he took it down. We all know whose side Denis is on. But, in it, you can see this short guy to whom Oswald was talking in the hallway, where Oswald asked Bookhout what he had against something.

And then, seeing him from behind led to the connection to the Garage Shooter.

Then, the one who recognized that Bookhout was the Ruby impostor in the retrospective by Fred Rhinestein was the man we refer to as the Wizard.

It was also the Wizard who correctly identified Bookhout in the ROTC photo as this guy:

And, it was also the Wizard who found this image of Bookhout behind Oswald's stretcher as he was rolled out of the jail office:

Then there was the discovery of the photographic and film alterations relating to the Oswald shooting, including Beers and Jackson. Credit for the discovery of the phony hand of Oswald slapped to his chest in the Jackson photo goes to OIC member Craig Roberts.

That is not a hand; it is two hands clasped together. And that humungous thumb, which is a right thumb, could not possibly be Oswald's. 

The whole bit about Leavelle having his hand in Oswald's pants is another piece of fakery. 

That is a fake forearm that you're seeing there. And then they had to go back and make it happen in all the films as well.

What you're seeing there is anatomically impossible. That can't be Leavelle's arm. It would have had to be fractured.

This is by no measure a complete or comprehensive list of our 2016 accomplishments, and I am going to ask Larry Rivera to provide me a list of his own because I know he was involved in a lot of things. But, already it can be seen that 2016 was a very productive year in which the cause of JFK truth was advanced a lot. We have every reason to feel satisfied and encouraged, and we do. And I told you what I am going to do early in 2017, meaning in January. You didn't forget, did you? You didn't think I was kidding, did you? Well, if you thought that, you don't know me. 

Michael Hardin was the 23 year old ambulance driver for Oswald, and he was interviewed by WC attorney Leon Hubert. This is from it: 

Mr. HARDIN. And we got him in the car, or ambulance, they drove the armored truck on out of the basement on the Commerce Street side, and we went out behind the truck. Of course, the truck was there when we left, and then went east on Commerce to the expressway, and north on the expressway to Elm and then west on Elm to Harwood and north on Harwood to Harry Hines, and north on Hines to Parkland. 

---

Mr. HUBERT. And what happened when you got to Parkland?

Now, I am going to indulge in some script-writing where I imagine how Mr. Hubert might have responded differently if he was more like me: 

Mr. HARDIN. And we got him in the car, or ambulance, they drove the armored truck on out of the basement on the Commerce Street side, and we went out behind the truck. Of course, the truck was there when we left, and then went east on Commerce to the expressway, and north on the expressway to Elm and then west on Elm to Harwood and north on Harwood to Harry Hines, and north on Hines to Parkland. 

Mr. HUBERT. Wait a second. Weren't you on Harwood? Dallas City Hall is on Harwood The street address is Harwood. I know that. Do you want me look it up for you? I can give you the exact address.

Mr. HARDIN. That isn't necessary.

Mr. HUBERT. Hush; it's no trouble at all. Wait. Hold on. OK, here it is: 106 S. Harwood. So, you were there on Harwood, and all you had to do was go north on Harwood. So, why didn't you do that? You had a dying man in the car.

Mr. HARDIN: Well, Commerce is a one-way street, and....

Mr. HUBERT. And YOU are an ambulance driver who is legally sanctioned to disregard traffic laws in an emergency, are you not?

Mr. HARDIN. Yes.

Mr. HUBERT: And this was an emergency, was it not? 

Mr. HARDIN. Yes.

Mr. HUBERT: Well?

Mr. HARDIN. Well, one of the police officers directed me to go the way I did.

Mr. HUBERT: Which police officer?

Mr. HARDIN. I don't remember which one. I couldn't tell you that. 

Mr. HUBERT: Well, we are definitely going to look into that and find out, but let's stay on this. Did you, or did you not realize that Oswald was in dire straits and that every second counted?

Mr. HARDIN. Well, I really didn't know how badly he was hurt. There was no visible blood. 

Mr. HUBERT. But, you knew where he was shot, right? In the upper abdomen through the rib cage from left to right? You are aware that there are many vital organs and major blood vessels in that area?

Mr. HARDIN. Yes, but.. 

Mr. HUBERT. And you knew he was unconscious. That's a bad sign, isn't it? 

Mr. HARDIN. Again, I was just doing what I was told. 

Mr. HUBERT: What if it was your brother bleeding and dying in that ambulance? Would you have obeyed a policeman then if he told you to take a long cut to the hospital? 

Mr. HARDIN: I would rather not answer that.

Mr. HUBERT. I bet you wouldn't. Which ramp did you use to enter?

Mr. HARDIN: The Main Street ramp. 

Mr. HUBERT: Why didn't you use it to go out? It was north, and you were going north. Right?

Mr. HARDIN: Well, we were facing the other way. 

Mr. HUBERT: Would it have been so hard to back up and turn around?

Mr. HARDIN: Not particularly. 

Mr. HUBERT: Then why didn't you do it?

Mr. HARDIN: Well, they were moving the armored truck out of the way on Commerce Street, and it seemed like they wanted us to go out that way.

Mr. HUBERT: And then you turned left on Commerce and went quite a distance in a direction that was 120 degrees away from the direction that you needed to go. Isn't that true, Mr. Hardin?

Mr. HARDIN: I guess.

Mr. HUBERT: You guess? Are you being sarcastic, Mr. Hardin? A man died here. 

Mr. HARDIN: I know. I mean no; I'm not being sarcastic. Honestly, I just did what the police told me to do. It's pretty hard to say no to the police.

silent pause

Mr. HUBERT: Alright, now tell me everything that happened on that ride, everything that was said and done, whether Oswald reacted in any way, and whether he showed any signs of responsiveness. Now start.