Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

After announcing his retirement from OIC-bashing, where he was to be moving on, Clark Rob (who goes by Rob) stayed retired for only about 48 hours before resuming his occupation. I guess he decided that retired life was dull. But unfortunately, the brief rest did him no good because he is just as stupid as ever. He is truly brainless. There is not a speck of rationality between his ears. This is the guy who famously gave us this as matching patterns:

 
You see vertical lines on Lovelady's shirt. Show me one vertical line on Doorman's shirt. And even the horizontal lines on Doorman's shirt are more like splotches, not fine lines as we see on Lovelady. To say that those two patterns are the same, as Rob does, is utterly stupid. It's insane. A small child could tell you that they're not the same.

But now, Clark Rob is disputing my putting Oswald's weight at 131 pounds. I got that from Professor Gerald McKnight, and I know he is someone that Joseph Backes respects a great deal, as do I. But, we have a way to confirm it.

The New Orleans Police weighed Oswald when they arrested him, and they recorded his weight as 140 pounds. They said he was 5'9" and 140.

So, that tells us what Oswald looked like at 140. That was in August 1963, so let's compare him to November 22, 1963.

I'd say he lost weight; considerable weight. You have to admit that he lost weight. He went from being full and round in the face to being slender and gaunt. When I first made the comparison (and bear in mind that from having a lot of experience with people and their body weights, I'm rather good at this) I pegged him at 132 pounds. That's why when I heard Gerald McKnight say that Oswald was 131 at the time of the assassination, it struck a chord with me. I figured not bad (on my part) for just eyeing it.

But, even if one were going to continue to dispute it, would anyone in his right mind not concede that Oswald lost, at a very minimum, 5 pounds? You would have to be blind or crazy not to grant that.

So, that would make him 5'9" 135 pounds in contrast to Lovelady's 5'8" 170 pounds, and we have that on paper from the FBI.

That means that Oswald was one inch taller and 35 pounds lighter than Lovelady- at the very least, and probably closer to 40 pounds lighter. Do you think anyone was going to have trouble telling them apart? Again, they might as well have been Laurel and Hardy.

And don't forget about Buell Fraziier's testimony at the mock trial. Bugliosi asked him directly if Oswald and Lovelady looked alike, and Frazier shook his head no. He said that Lovelady was "short and husky" whereas Oswald had a "more a slender type frame." That is what came to his mind.

So, once again, you're dead wrong, Clark Rob.  You're always wrong. You're wrong about everything. You have never landed a blow against me.  Not once. But keep up the effort because it's phony CTs like you that expose the fraudulence of the whole JFK disinformation movement that is rampant right now. You want to fight some more? Fine with me because I can beat the shit out of all of yous. Bring it on, mo-fo.