Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Wow. Just when I thought Backes couldn't get any more stupid, he surprises me. Look at this image, and read below what he said about it.

Backes: "This is a mother who wants her child to see JFK.  She wants to tell her child as it grows up I took you to see JFK.  So, no, the child’s back is not towards us. The mother brought her child to see JFK.  This is how Cinque lies, “I'll say it again: the baby is facing the mother and leaning against her right shoulder.” This is bullshit. The mother is holding her child by her right arm and the child is facing out from her at approximately 45 degrees.  This is quite normal when mothers would lift their children to see something, or someone in a parade setting."

Cinque: Since that baby looks to be about 1 year old, why would the mother want it to see JFK? How could a baby grasp who JFK was? If the baby is facing out, how come we can't see any of the baby's face? All we can see is orange hat. No face. No face. No face. No face. We can see the mother's face, although all of her facial features are absent. But, we can see her face, and we know she is facing JFK. But, the baby's face is completely obscured. So, how do you figure the baby is seeing JFK? 

Backes:   "And another Cinque lie is that the child as filmed in Towner has a different posture in Altgens." 

Cinque: Well yes, he's standing and facing Elm Street in Altgens. The Towner baby is being held and is facing the other direction. Notice that you can see the boy's face. Can you see the baby's face?

Backes: "It’s not true. He’s inserting something false to use as evidence to support his lies. And by the way, the Towner film captures JFK prior to the shooting while the Altgens photo was taken during the shooting."

Cinque: I know, but the difference was only 2 seconds- at the most. 

 Backes:  "Also, the woman and child are photographed from different perspectives. And we see the woman and child from an extreme blow-up of the Altgens photograph while we’re not getting anything like that in the Towner film."

Cinque: Above, they are sized proportionately. And I know about the different perspectives, but that wouldn't turn a boy into a baby. They are not the same kid, Backes. And I am using the Towner frame that Robin Unger provided. If there is a better one, let me know. Have you got one? As far as I know, this is the best one there is. It's the only one there is that shows the mother and baby plainly. 

Backes: "Burke was commenting on the crap enlargement you gave him." 

Cinque: The image came from Robin Unger, and all I did was crop it. And it happens to be the best there is. Are you forgetting that all the versions of the Towner film online don't show the mother and baby at all? Or they are so faint as to be next to invisible? I'm afraid the one from Unger is the only game in town. Which of the three frames below would you use to observe the woman and baby?

I think I know what your problem is: I mean besides having the brain power of a bowl of jello. The problem is that besides not knowing how to think, you don't even know how to look. It's like you're blind. You don't open your mind, but you also don't open your eyes. For you to say that these two little ones are facing the same direction and doing the same thing is insane. 

Backes, one has to be a baby, that is, if it's anything, but the other is a little boy in a denim-style jacket. And you were born stupid, and you are going to stay that way. You're lucky the taxpayers support you because otherwise, you'd starve.