Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

bpete, Oswald said he was out with Bill Shelley in front at the time- and you can't change that.

He named someone who was out there. Do you understand what that means? It means that Oswald had direct knowledge of the circumstances in that doorway, who was there, which he only could have gotten from being there himself.

And as far as no one saying anything beyond their Warren Commission testimony, the same fear that controlled them during their Warren Commission testimony controlled them after their Warren Commission testimony. The warning was: don't say it EVER. Not just when they testified to the WC but ever.

Oswald said he was out with Bill Shelley in front. That's what he told the lead detective. It wasn't a response to a journalist when he was being hounded and rattled with questions coming from all directions and where the statement was framed by the reporter not by Oswald.  Under the controlled conditions of a direct police interrogation, he said he was out with Bill Shelley in front.  Out with Bill Shelley in front. Out with Bill Shelley in front. Out with Bill Shelley in front.

And you rotten liar, how many times do I have to tell you that Oswald's t-shirt varied according to whether it was pulled down in front or in back. When it was pulled down in back, the vee largely went away; but when it was pulled down in front; the vee became prominent. The vee fluctuated, but there was a unmistakable vee-ish tendency that prevailed most of the time, including when he was in the doorway. It was not true of Lovelady's t-shirt.

Do you foolishly think that a contrary photo wipes out the preponderance of the photographic evidence? Oswald's t-shirt clearly had the tendency to sink into a vee. Oswald's t-shirt ALONE had the tendency to sink into a vee. You, bpete, are nothing but a dastardly liar.