Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Let me present this theory concisely:

1) None of the online versions of the Towner film show the Woman and Baby at all. When people say otherwise, it's only because they have seen the other, and they are filling in the blanks with their mind. No uninformed person would pick out the woman and baby in any of the online versions of the film.

2) Even the gif clips of the Towner show the Woman and Baby very sparsely.

3) Therefore, how did they come up with this?

I want you to compare it to the gif.

Note that the pink of Jackie's outfit is much lighter in the gif than what we see in the still frame. Scroll up and down if necessary. It's rich and dark in the first one above, but light and faded in the one directly above.

Both of those came from Robin Unger. So, what I want to know Robin is: did you or someone do some color enhancing of the still frame? The colors are much deeper, Robin, and I suspect you gave them some help.

And what's the extra projection of black on the Woman?

I say "extra" because I can't imagine what it pertains to in real life. It's not her hand. And I don't imagine her hair jutted out like that. We also see it in the crop from the gif:

So, what is that extra streak of black jutting sideways from her hair? Did somebody's hand slip when he photoshopped this?

I say we should reject that still frame because somebody cheated. Somebody added color to it. That is pretty obvious. And that bizarre black extension does not add to the credibility.