Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Clark Rob is truly an idiot. I guarantee you he didn’t make into triple digits with his IQ.

First, he questions whether Lovelady’s striped shirt- the one which he wore to the FBI photo shoot and majorly unbuttoned so that he could look like Doorman- is the same striped shirt he was talking about when he stated that “he was wearing a red and white vertically striped shirt and blue jeans.”

Maybe the one he posed in was a blue and white striped shirt, as opposed to his red and white one, which was at home, says Rob. But, how likely is that? Anyone want to put a number to it?

I just checked my closet. I’ve got a lot of shirts but not two of the same pattern except different colors.

But, what the hell difference does it make? Let’s say Lovelady had a blue and white striped shirt and a red and white striped shirt. And let’s say he wore the red and white one on 11/22 and the blue and white one on 2/29. It seems far-fetched to me, but we’ll go with it for now- hypothetically.

Doorman’s shirt wasn’t striped at all, so that changes nothing. And the shirt they are claiming for Lovelady on 11/22 was plaid, which is also not striped.

So, even if Clark Rob’s unlikely speculation is true, it doesn’t make a lick of difference.

So, why bring it up? I don't know. Ask him. 

Next, Clark Rob quotes Josiah Thompson who essentially just denied what we can plainly read in the FBI letter. Note that Josiah Thompson NEVER talked to Lovelady. He only claimed to speak to somebody at CBS News. But, in the words of the vernacular, so fucking what?

Rob, let’s put this into V terms, since you pretend to represent V, which you don’t.  Remember in V for Vendetta that the British Broadcasting Network did the government’s bidding? They reported exactly what they were told about the bombing of the Old Bailey. They falsely reported that V had been killed and showed phony footage of it where they had mistakenly shot someone else whom V had forced into a V costume. And they told other lies for the state as well. Well, think of CBS News as the American equivalent of the British Broadcasting Network in V for Vendetta.  Are you getting the picture now? 

I don’t know why you like to use V’s image when you are the antithesis of him.

The facts are that the FBI put it in writing that Lovelady stated he wore a red and white vertical striped shirt and blue jeans. That is a categorical statement. You can’t just deactivate it, not unless you’re the Adam Sutler type, which Clark Rob is. It’s who he is really working for.

Then, Rob brings up my $50,000 challenge, including the picture of Lovelady, where he is obviously wearing a plaid shirt. 

He takes that as a concession from me that Lovelady must have really been wearing a plaid shirt.

No, not at all. I picked that picture because I insist that it be a picture of Lovelady from 11/22/63. If I had one of Lovelady wearing a striped shirt on 11/22, I would gladly use it. But, I don’t. 

Besides, the other side claims that that is Lovelady and that 30 minutes before he was standing in the doorway as Doorman. So, since that is their claim, it is fair to use it and compare it to Doorman. But keep in mind that there is no doubt  in my mind that not only was that not Lovelady’s shirt, but that wasn’t even Lovelady.

But no again, Clark Rob. Once again, your low IQ problem rears its ugly head. I never said that they had a Lovelady imposter there on 11/22/63. And quit misrepresenting me because you are really pissing me off. You have no right to do that  There were no Lovelady imposters there on 11/22/63. They were all added to various films afterwards. Months afterwards at the very least and in some cases, years afterwards. That’s how it went down. Nothing happened on 11/22/63 except that they altered the Altgens photo.  Everything else came later.

And then, unbefuckinglievably, Clark Rob posts CE 369 and claims that the very visible arrow we see is Lovelady’s. 

No, you dumb fuck! That was Frazier’s arrow. It’s in the white. Frazier’s was in the white. Lovelady’s arrow was in the black. How can you be so stupid?

Even David Von Pein, a rabid lone-nutter, has come around to admitting that that was Frazier's arrow, but we've got Clark Rob, a supposed CT, calling it Lovelady's. 

Then, there is the statement that Lovelady signed for Robert Groden in 1976. Well, by then he was deeply involved in the conspiracy.  He wasn’t in the beginning but by May 1964 when he was interviewed by Jones Harris, he was sucked into it, and he remained in it for the rest of his life. So, that signed statement means nothing.

You know, Clark Rob, V was good at seeing through government scams, but you keep falling for them. Get it into your head that there was nothing honest about the HSCA. It was just another government whitewash.  Understand?

And Rob, about your request, fuck you. But listen up because I'm giving you some advice: The only thing you're good at is making disgusting and grotesque imagery. So, stick to that and give up trying to analyze the case. Play with your 12 year old son; and you and he are at the same grade level, I’m sure you get along fine. But leave the serious study of the JFK assassination to the grown-ups, will you?

And where the hell is Lance Uppercut? I wish he would get started because I am getting really fed up with the low caliber of my opposition.  Backes, Rob, and bpete…. The Three Louseketeers.