Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Now that I have access to all of bpete's images, here is one that amounts to his handwritten confession:

Yeah, bpete pretty much signed that baby, and it is indeed, a work of art. I'm very glad to have it because it is clear as a bell.

The problem is that it's supposed to be the same guy as this guy:

Now, I take it you don't have to glance and forth too many times to realize that that skinny guy on the left is a modified form of that he-man on the right. How do I know which one is fake? Well, for one thing, bpete's guy has an impossible spinal configuration, with his spine swayed back grossly and his neck going forward.

 That guy couldn't stand that way if he wanted to. What happened is that they changed the aspect ratio so much that they distorted him- severely. That guy is a monstrosity, and I am not exaggerating.

And bpete did it because he wanted to create a piece of phony photographic evidence that Frazier was standing behind up on the landing to, supposedly, account for him being MIA from the Altgens photo and the Wiegman film.

In his Warren Commission testimony, Frazier said- at least 6 times- that he was on the steps, and he even detailed that he was down from the top:

"I was standing on the steps there."
"Yes, sir; I was, I was standing about, I believe, one step down from the top there."
"Yes, Sir, I was standing there by the rail." (the rail didn't reach the top)
"This was the first step and I was standing right around there.
"Where I was standing on the steps..."
"I told them I was out on the steps there."
"I was standing, like I say, one step down from the top."
"From where we were standing on the steps there, it sounded like back down to the right."
"As you stood on the front steps of the Book Depository Building, is that right? (Ball) "Right." (Frazier)

HOLY MOLEY! That is a lot of referencing to him being on the steps and not on the top landing.
So, what is bpete going on to deny all that? Frazier, at one point said,

"I was back up in this more or less black area here."

Then, at another point, Frazier said: "Shadow from the roof there knocked the sun from out our eyes," and bpete uses that as evidence he was up on the landing. But notice that Frazier never said he was up on the landing; he always described his position as on the steps.

And when you compare the amount of evidence, there is no comparison: Frazier said he was on the steps. It wins hands down.

But, here is the case that bpete is trying to make, and these were taken from his site without permission. Ah, the joy of being on blogspot:

Now, do you see why he had to slim that other guy down? It doesn't work so well with the other guy.

Methinks they weren't the same guy. The guy on the left looks like he could play Batman, the Man in the Steel, in the movie.

Is there any evidence that Frazier wasn't wearing his jacket on steps? He was wearing it a short while later at the Dallas PD. The reason I ask is because we also have this comparison:

As you can see, there are definite matches between Buell Wesley Frazier and the man in the center.

Both had or wore:
1) short black hair
2) a short black jacket
3) light pants
4) a slender build
5) long legs

That is quite a bit of matching. So, if that's not Frazier, who was that? Was there someone else at the Depository who looked and dressed that much like him? If so, who? How is it possible that after 50 years, we haven't figured that out?

The question is, when was that He-Man turned into that skinny, discombobulated freak that bpete claims is Frazier? And who did it? It wasn't necessarily bpete, but it was necessarily somebody. And it was somebody with an explicit purpose: to lie, deceive, and mislead about the JFK assassination.

The magnitude of the photographic fakery that has been done in the JFK assassination is breathtaking to behold. And don't assume it was all done at the time. And don't assume they are finished either.