Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

A real air-head named "Bud" responded to me on McAdams' about 9/11. He said:

Bud: No, I wouldn`t resist, and neither would you. A free-for-all in the cabin puts everyone at risk. Most hijackings turn out ok, you sit and see how it plays out, you don`t force an outcome right away.

CInque: You stupid mudder-rucker. That's true SO LONG AS THE HIJACKERS DON'T DEMAND TO FLY THE PLANE. If they're willing to let the pilots fly them to a public airport within flying range, you do it. But the moment they demand to fly the plane themselves, you tell them to go fuck themselves because where they're going there are no virgins and no dates either. See how it plays out.... think! you stupid moron.  

Bud:  They only had to neutralize the crew and tell the passengers they had a bomb. 

Cinque: Only neutralize the crew? How long do you think that would take? Because I'm pretty sure the pilot, co-pilot, and flight engineer weren't going to stick their necks out to be cut. And they certainly weren't going to turn over the controls of the plane. So, the result would have been a fight, and I'm saying that as soon as the fight started, the passengers would have heard it, and then many able-bodied men would have rushed down the aisle to take it to them. And they'd be coming in from behind, jumping the terrorists from behind as the little shits were fighting with the pilots in front of them.  

Listen up, Bud: Don't you ever again say that they only had to neutralize the crew, as if that was some easy, sure thing because you are pissing me off. 

And what?  I'm rushing down the aisle, and I hear the terrorist say, "We got bomb" and so I stop?  Is that what you would do?  That would be stupid. It's enough of a stretch to think they smuggled the box-cutters on-board, but you think they smuggled bombs on too? How? Dumb pluck.  

Bud: You realize the pilot is in a separate room from the passengers, right?

Cinque: Yeah, but we're assuming that the terrorists breached the door, right? So, it's open right? Or are you saying that the terrorists got through the door, closed it behind them, and then locked it to keep the passengers out? 

People, this is the mentality of not just this person "Bud" but of all those who try to defend the official story of 9/11. It's total bull shit. It's highly doubtful that the terrorists would have succeeded in taking over a single plane, never mind 4. With box-cutters? BOX-CUTTERS?????  

We can test this. We take a box-cutter, and we put the blade in backwards, so it isn't sharp. Then we get two combatants. One is given the mock-box-cutter; the other is unarmed. Let's see how easy it is deliver a lethal or disabling slash with it. We'll judge it by location. But remember: there are multiple layers of clothing involved. The defender has on, say, a shirt and a jacket, and that material would have to be cut through before any skin is reached. The defender is going to have his fists up protecting his face. I don't see how any arteries are going to be accessible. 

What I'm saying is that the box-cutter is just one factor in the fight. The size, the weight, the strength, and the fighting ability of the two men are going to over-ride it. The better, more competent fighter is going to win that exchange, regardless of who has the box-cutter. 

In fact, if the defender happens to be good at fighting, he's going to neutralize that guy with the box-cutter in seconds. 

But equally important is that other men- and perhaps even women- will be joining in on the side of the defender. 

What I'm saying is that the little shits could never have overcome with their lousy box-cutters. That's the bottom line. You got that, Bud?