Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

The JFK world is a sick and twisted world, and it is so sick and twisted that I don't think there is another world like it. 

I'm referring to the fact that Oswald accusers and supposed Oswald defenders will collude, conspire, and cooperate, all with the greatest mutual respect, despite their polar-opposite leanings- when the only thing they should be exchanging are spitballs to the eye.

It happens in the JFK truth movement, but it doesn't in the 9/11 truth movement, that I know of. There, you don't see 9/11 truthers cozying up and teaming up with 9/11 debunkers for some higher purpose. There is no higher purpose. 

The official story of 9/11 has it that 19, mostly little, Arab men overcame 4, count 'em, 1, 2, 3, 4 flight crews by way of having box-cutters, and then were able to manually fly these airliners to precise pin-point destinations, including a 270 degree spiraling descent in Washington to hit the Pentagon (except for the plane which crashed in Pennsylvania and fell into a hole and was eaten by the ground). And then from "office fires" the buildings collapsed into their own footprints, falling straight-down through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall speed, and that includes a building that was never hit by a plane and had only minimal fires.

Now, either you believe that, or you don't, and the people who don't, don't make nice with the people who do.  At least, I've never seen it. 

So, why in the JFK world, do you have a guy like Joseph Backes, who is supposed to be an Oswald defender, telling rabid, relentless lone-nutter Hank Sienzant (alias; I call him Sienfake) "Hank, I've got your back." ???

Why would a real Oswald defender do that? A real Oswald defender wouldn't. 

Why would Lee Farley, who is supposed to be an Oswald defender, provide a link to Denis Morissette, who is a known Oswald accuser and collaborator with John McAdams? Why would he have a link to the criminal bpete who has Oswald "locking and loading" on the 6th floor? And why would he have a link to Robin Unger who supports not only the official assassination story but the fidelity of every single assassination image and film, where every single image and film is as pure as the driven snow? It is a situation in which every single image and film wound up in government hands- and I mean every single one without exception. And yet, not even did they alter any image or film in order to support the official story?

It's one thing for people who support the official story to say that. But, for people who say that the official story is a lie- and not just a lie, but a complete, total, 180 degree, diabolical, cataclysmic, categorical lie- to vouch for the entire JFK assassination film and photo record, as if they devilishly lied in what they said about the assassination but not in one thing they showed about it is truly astounding. It is truly incredible.  

The JFK world is a sick, twisted world, and there is nothing else like it in this world. It is a very evil world.