Look at the parallels between Lee Harvey Oswald and Jeffrey Epstein. Both were being held under the tightest security known to Man. Both possessed extremely damaging information that would have hurt very powerful people. In Oswald's case, he not only possessed proof that he was innocent, but he could prove that the FBI had framed him. They came up with that bogus order form for the rifle. Oswald could have proven that he never possessed it. Had he lived, his wife would have been HIS witness, and without falling in the clutches of the FBI and Secret Service, she would have told that truth that he never owned that rifle or any rifle in the U.S. She did tell the truth when first asked on 11/22/63, that he owned a rifle years before in Russia, which he sold. Why would she mention that if he currently owned one? She wouldn't. She couldn't. She didn't. She mentioned it because she was trying to be helpful, and that was the closest she could place Oswald to a rifle.
So, the authorities needed Oswald dead. They needed him dead badly. It wasn't just that they couldn't let him testify at trial. They couldn't even let him speak to a lawyer - not even once. I counted, and there were at least 13 times that Oswald wailed about not having a lawyer.
So, then what? These people like J. Edgar Hoover just got lucky? He just got lucky that Jack Ruby came along and saved his wicked ass? And no, Hoover did not put Ruby up to doing it. Ruby was no assassin. He was no hitman. He was no one you would ever trust to fire a gun in a crowded space. They didn't need him to shoot Oswald. They just needed him to take the blame for it.
And then there's Epstein being held at a federal prison. It's called the Metropolitan Correctional Center but that's an Orwellian euphemism. It's closer to Shawshank Prison. And it's a place that has been handling hardened criminals for almost 50 years. You would think that, by now, the issue of inmates hurting or killing themselves would be well in hand. And even though we refer to Epstein having been on suicide watch, once you've been on suicide watch, are you ever completely off it? How could anyone claim to know that someone who attempted suicide won't try it again? And listen: in an institution as depressing as that one, why not make a permanent practice to protect prisoners from hurting themselves? Instead of bothering to have psychiatrists designate people as being dangerous to themselves or not, why not just assume that all prisoners are? And frankly, I have to believe it can be done without constant supervision. You make sure the sheets and blankets can't be used as ligatures, and they manufacture such sheets and blankets. And forget about having bunk beds. Just have single beds. Or at least, if a prisoner is alone in a cell, make it a single. How hard is that? We went to the fucking moon, remember? Oh, and by the way, it was only recently that the head of the Russian space program, said that Russia is sending an unmanned spacecraft to the moon- to take pictures of the stuff the Americans left behind.
But, I digress. So, you remove the prisoner's shoe laces. Give him some slip-ons. If you can go to the moon, you can do that. You make sure there are no posts in the room, nowhere from which he can suspend a ligature, and you make sure there are no ligatures. Honestly, how tough is it to make a cell hang-proof? It's not tough at all.
The good news is that it seems that a large percentage of Americans are not buying the Epstein story. I'm not saying they are going to start a revolution over it, but they are indeed snickering. The media, of course, buys it, although it's more like they're selling it. Supposedly, Epstein was found with the sheet tied around his neck strangling him, having broken his hyoid bone, and the other end tied to the post of the bunk bed, as he knelt and leaned towards the floor. Why wasn't that reported immediately? Why did we have to wait several days? And what happened in several days to make the dissemination of that information OK? Who made the decision not to reveal to the press immediately how Epstein was able to hang himself? And how come not one outlet within the corporate media complained about the withholding of that information? How come they all just repeated the mantra that Epstein hung himself without even questioning how he did it? How did being brain-dead become the standard for the U.S. media?
Most people assume, and rightly so, that Epstein was gong to reveal the names of the rich, famous, and powerful men he provided underage girls to for sex. I think it's likely that his lawyers were going to bargain with that information. It would be one thing if Epstein had been tried already and convicted and sentenced to enough years to comprise a life sentence. But, that hadn't happened yet. Don't you think he wanted to stick around for the legal fight? He was a competitive guy, wasn't he? If he was involved in high finance, what's more competitive than that? Don't you think he had the best lawyers money can buy? Don't you think he wanted to see what they could do?
It pleases me that so many Americans are rejecting the official story about the death of Jeffrey Epstein, and with extreme prejudice, it seems. Now, I am asking them to reject the official story about the death of Lee Harvey Oswald too. I can't tell you exactly who killed Epstein, although a lot of people lean towards a certain ex-President and his lovely wife, who I would never say anything bad about, in fear of my life. But, I can tell you who killed Oswald. The Dallas Police and the FBI killed Oswald. Jack Ruby was just a guy they tricked into going there beforehand, for which they grabbed him and then inserted him into the story a little later. And he was sick enough in the head that they could convince him that he did it. It was slick, I tell you:very slick; also monstrous and evil to the highest magnitude.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.