Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I found this image of Ghislaine Maxwell which was taken at an Oscars after-party in 2014 that was sponsored by Vanity Fair. 

What I am reading is that the L.A. pictures were staged by her attorney, Leah Saffian. But, that doesn't mean it isn't her. It just means that they are trying to give us false information about her.  But, in that case, we need to speculate on why there was a desire on her part, and her attorney, for her to surface in L.A. The only reason I can think of is because she's not in L.A. any more and is probably very far from L.A. She's probably out of the country.  

You see the open book she is reading. The Post reported the title of the book, but how could they know it? Someone must have told them, and probably Leah Saffian. Was Saffian the one who took the pictures? The book is: The Book of Honor: The Secret Lives and Deaths of CIA Operatives. On the very day the pictures surfaced, a review of the book went up on Amazon by one "G. Maxwell." But, look at that thick wad of unread book. That's got to be at least 200 pages. So, who submits a book review BEFORE they finish the book? Plus, if you look at the review, you can see that "G. Maxwell" read the Kindle edition, not the hard cover edition. 

So, below the 5 stars, it says the date, August 15, 2019, and then below that, it says Format: Kindle Edition. So, that has to be another G. Maxwell, right? But then, what are we talking about? An extraordinary coincidence that on the same day she was spotted reading the book at a burger joint in L.A., someone  with the same first initial and last name just happened, by coincidence, to submit a review of the same book on Amazon? What are the mathematical odds of that?

It's been pointed out that there is nothing in the photo to establish the date. It's not like she's holding a newspaper with a date on it. 

What if it was staged right before she left L.A.? Or even weeks or months before? And what do you think the chances are that this woman possesses other ID with which to travel? I rate the chance of that at 100%. So, what if it was done just to start a woman-hunt for her in L.A. even though she is far gone and perhaps long gone? And look at her hair.

Do you notice that that looks like it could very easily be a wig? Here she is, below, in 1991. She had thin hair, but look at that nice sheen it had. That's because sebaceous glands oil the hair. 

Now, that is real hair, and her hair was thin. And remember who you are reading here: Dr. Cinque. And this is me telling you that human hair does not get thicker with age, and we are talking about the passage of nearly 30 years of aging. 

So, since that appears to be a mop on her head, and notice how dry it looks (like straw) imagine how different she must look without it? Hair frames your whole face. It very strongly affects your appearance. Look how they changed Oswald's look by transferring the hairline of Young Billy Lovelady to him in the Altgens photo.

So, on the left is how Oswald must have looked in the Altgens photo before they tampered with it, and on the right is what they gave us. 

So, were those pictures of her in L.A. released after she was safely ensconced in a hideout far, far away? And remember, she probably has the kind of resources to disappear permanently. And even if she didn't, she's got the kind of friends who could easily afford to keep her in burgers for the rest of her life. So, is she now completely gone? Vanished?