Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

One last thing about the Epstein case: why haven't we heard from Mark Epstein, Jeffrey's brother? He was involved at the hearings. At the bail hearing, he offered to put up some of his apartment buildings in New York as bond. I can't find any statement from him since his brother died. I don't know if he buys the story that his brother committed suicide, but even if he does, he knows that the Metropolitan Correctional Center was responsible for protecting his brother from harm, including self-harm, and they were programmed and prepared and provisioned, through decades of experience, to prevent that very thing from happening. 

So, why haven't we heard from him? And why hasn't he filed a civil lawsuit for wrongful death?  The MCC is responsible for his brother's death. They were charged with the responsibility of protecting him, weren't they? So, why wouldn't he want to punish and disgrace them to the full extent of the law? 

And that makes me wonder about the claim a lot of people, including people in my circle, are making that Epstein is alive, that he was skirted out of there. There are some compelling arguments for it. 

If you think Epstein was hung by others, you gotta realize that it was no easy task. Oh sure, with enough men, they could have hung him easily, but could they have done it quietly? The moment he saw a cluster of men, and undoubtedly large men, approaching his cell, I should think he would have had the good sense to start screaming at the top of his lungs. It's a crowded, cramped place, and making noise would have been his best defense. And even though they could have overcome him, he was 6 foot, 180 pounds, and he appeared to be in good shape. How hard would he have fought? How much of a racket would the struggle have made? But wait! There's more! THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN LIMITED IN HOW MUCH FORCE THEY COULD APPLY TO HIM. They couldn't damage him. They couldn't leave marks on him or traumatize him beyond what the hanging alone would do.  They knew his body was going to be examined.  So, they couldn't go Navy Seal on him. How would that look? 

So, how long would it have taken them, and how much noise would it have made? And what certainty was there that the result would look completely like a self-inflicted hanging?

So, there's no doubt that doing something with his cooperation would have been much safer and better. And Epstein was a smart guy. I presume he would have realized that no matter what they told him, they could easily kill him as soon as they got him out of there. 

And that is exactly what I allege happened to Lee Harvey Oswald. The Dallas cops must have told him that they believed him, that he had ties to U.S. intelligence, and they were going to get him out of this, but they had to fake his death first, because no matter what they said, many wouldn't believe that he was innocent, and the vigilantes would come gunning for him. So, in order to prevent that, they had to stage his killing on television. And they did stage it on television. Oswald was NOT shot in the garage.  There was no blood. The Jackson doesn't show any trauma to him or his clothing. They've got that ridiculous arm slapped to his chest, which supposedly happened in .3 second, just to cover the site of impact up because there was  no site of impact. Then afterwards, they must have taken him to a soundproof room and methodically put a bullet into him, and that's after sedating him. 

  
But, returning to Epstein, he would have been smart enough to get guarantees, such as bringing his brother into it, so that his brother knew. And that way, if they killed Epstein afterwards, the brother could sing like a canary and scream bloody murder and topple the whole thing. 

So, I don't claim to know what happened, but their goal was to prevent the damage that Epstein could do to Clinton, Prince Andrew and powerful others. So, why not do it the easy way rather than the hard way?