Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 

The FBI photo of Lovelady was sent to the Warren Commission, but they never published it. It wasn't published until Harold Weisberg published it in his book, Photographic Whitewash. And he had to sort through the "document pile" to find it.

On the right is that photo. Note that the HSCA edited it when they published it in 1979. They added a lot of shadow to it to soften it. Because: it is a freaky image. Nobody could actually look like that.

As I have said, the ONLY image of Lovelady that we can rely on is the one taken by Mark Lane. And in it we can plainly see that Lovelady had protruding ears. About 2 percent of people do, and he was among them.

In this collage, I have first an anatomical drawing showing the location of the ears. The superior attachment of the ear is at the same level as the corner of the eye. The top of the ear, the superor helix, is approxiately even with the top of the eye, as you can see in the drawing.

In the Mark Lane photo (center) the location of Lovelady's ears is fine, but you can see that they are protruding. In the FBI photo on the right, his right ear is too low. It is freakily low. In fact, no freak was ever that freaky. They, the FBI, did that to him, and no doubt it was to hide his protruding ears.

And that's not the only alteration that they did. They undoubtedly doctored his hair. The Mark Lane photo and the FBI photo were taken very close in time and may have been taken on the same day. So, their hair should look exactly the same.

Thank God for Mark Lane, because if not for him, we wouldn't have any reliable images of Billy Lovelady. We certainly can't trust the freaky FBI photo. Just remember who it came from: J Edgar Hoover. The evil, monstrous J Edgar Hoover, who no doubt was involved on killing Kennedy, and even more involved in the cover-up.