Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

It's easy to misconstrue the distances in a photo due to parallax, but this photo shows the distance between the obelisk and the small white retaining wall. 

 So, on the right, is the obelisk, and then farther down, beyond the path, there is the retaining wall. The woman in the red wrap is between them. In other images, it looks like they are very close, the wall and the obelisk, but above, you see there is a bit of a separation. Now, let's look at Croft.

You know that I maintain that JFK was already shot in the back here. On the far right, you can see the path a little behind the grey-haired older man, and further up from that is the obelisk. Note the woman in white and black who is just to the right of Kennedy. She is also in Altgens6.

In Altgens6, the woman in white and black is to the right of the obelisk. 

She is actually blocking the view of the doorway. How is that possible? Here is my Altgens recreation:

We see the retaining wall and the obelisk, but there is no way that a person standing at the end of the retaining wall, west of the obelisk, could block the view of the doorway. Therefore, it is impossible to correlate the Croft and Altgens photos. 

But, let's look closer at Altgens:

It's always bothered me that the obelisk in Altgens is leaning a little bit. To me, it seems to be leaning a little back and to the left. Compare it to mine again.

So, there is a little pitch there. The Croft people have been called the Croft ladies, but it includes a man. Let's compare him in Croft and Altgens.

Is that the same man? To me, the man on the right looks older. His shirt is a different color. And the man on the left seems to be wearing white pants. 

I have said for a long time that the Altgens photo was taken high on the hill, right after the back shot, and long before the throat shot. Yet, the imagery within the limo shows a crude rendering of JFK reacting to the throat shot. I maintain that it is fake, and that they did things to make it seem like the limo was lower on the hill than it was. 

Now, I want you to compare sizes on the right side of the photo to the left. In particular, look at the size of Hargis and Martin on their motorcycles on the right and compare them to the Croft folks on the left. Size is determined by distance from the camera. Was the distance to Altgens that much greater to the Croft folks than it was to Hargis and Martin? Below is a photo taken from a similar perspective.

Notice that there is little difference in size between the motorcycle cop on the right and the people on the other side of the street on the left. Compare to Altgens:

Do you see how that right/left size disparity is a bit too extreme? 

So, could they have had another image, perhaps one that we don't even know about, in which they harvested the imagery that we see on the left, left of the vehicles, and replaced whatever was there with it? And it would have been done to create the optical illusion that the limo was farther down the hill than it was- far enough down for JFK to have been shot in the throat already- which he wasn't when the Altgens photo was taken.   

I admit that this is just a hypothesis at this point, a mere speculation. And if you want to call it a wild speculation, so be it. But, I think it's fair to assume that Dino had the most crack team of photo-alterers in the world. They were photographic surgeons, and I don't put anything past them.