Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Here is a new collage, and there is good information from this. I deliberately chose an image of Oswald that has the same perspective as Doorman so that we can do an up-close facial comparison. 

Obviously, there is excellent correlation of the right ears and the right jawlines, which are on our left. But on the other side, it is a complete washout since Doorman's left jawline (on our right) has a deep crescent concavity, which is impossible unless he had some kind of cancer that eroded his face. Just look at the shape of it. And likewise, Doorman's left ear is an utter monstrosity; it's like a cauliflower. 

But, when he look above the eyes, On Oswald we see how his cranium is expanded, widened; it's like he had a big brain. It's massive.  

This is really uncanny, and I want you look at it again below with this thought in mind: that from the eyebrows down, there is excellent correlation where Doorman is all Oswald (except for the distortion of his face on his left side which was done by the alterers when they placed Black Tie Man into the photo). But from some point on the forehead on up, there is complete divergence between them, where Doorman lacks the ever-widening capacity of Oswald's cranium, and he has a different hairline with shorter hair, more recession, and an usual central recession. 

Let's try it another way:

Wow, what an excellent correlation. It's perfect except for the distortion in Doorman's face on his left side, but realize that it doesn't correlate to ANY human being. Lovelady wasn't built like that, and nobody is. Doorman is a freak on that side. But, putting that side, we've got a zinger. 

And now we have complete divergence with different hairlines, and because Doorman was more receded, his forehead appears longer. Oswald's hair is longer, fuller, and has more body. 

And that gets back to my original hypothesis that they moved Lovelady's cap (from when he was much younger) over to Doorman. 

Those who cling stubbornly and hopelessly to the Lovelady fraud really have a problem because how could Lovelady's hair remain that constant and identical over 6 years time? Exact same degree of recession in a rapidly balding young man? Exact same length when the hair grows every day and haircuts are intermittent and quite random for most people? Plus, people often change their minds about how long to wear their hair. Plus, it's the exact same lay where the hair was laying and behaving the same way. You know that hair behaves differently. People speak of having good hair days and bad hair days. Of course, that is usually said in reference to women, but it applies to men as well. What if we compared a picture of you from today to one from six years ago? Would your hair look exactly the same? In every respect? The problem is that this is too close a match, too good a match, even for one guy. 

I'll end on a funny note. What if we tried to do the same thing for these two? How far do you think we'd get?

Well, at least we'd get done quickly. All we'd have to say is: "Nothing matches."