Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

It's true that we don't see the vee in the Wiegman Doorman's t-shirt, but it is a very crude image, taken from a different angle, and the resolution just isn't there. The truth is that we can't tell anything about the shape of his t-shirt in Wiegman. It's just a hazy mess. 

So, we just have to ignore that issue as pertains to Wiegman. This is no deal-breaker. No threat here. But amazingly, the punk is claiming that there is white t-shirt within that dark vee of Altgens Doorman's, hidden from view. No, there isn't, punk. But, there is red on YOUR t-shirt, and it's from the blood of John Kennedy.

And the punk tries to correlate these two images:

But her vee is up on her neck; it's not down on her chest as on him. And her vee is steep on one side and flat on the other; it is asymmetrical. It isn't symmetrical like his. His is just the shape of the t-shirt. And I proved it myself. 

On the right is me in a v-shaped t-shirt. It's from the Altgens Reenactment done in late November 2012. The dark is definitely my skin, and the white is the t-shirt. The vee is formed by the junction of my skin with the white fabric of the t-shirt. Gee, I wonder if the punk thinks that there is white t-shirt hidden in the dark vee on me. He has made that claim for Doorman, so why not make it for me? But, I was there, and I know exactly what was going on. The shape of the t-shirt as it appears is the shape that it actually was. There is no optical illusion. So, why does my Caucasian skin look so dark? For the same reason that Doorman's does: highly polarized film. It was Tri-X film, just like Altgens used. 

Here it is again, and on the right, it shows what bpunk claims was going on, with the ultra-white area representing the part of the shirt that, according to him, was completely obscured. It is complete, utter nonsense. 

  
And the punk wants to deny that these two are totally alike:

How can he do it? It's simple; anybody can claim anything. You can sit down at your keyboard and hit any keys you want, say whatever you like. You can say that up is down, black is white, right is left. But, you can't make the blood go away. 

I have told bpunk a zillion times that the vee did not always manifest on Oswald's t-shirt. It depended on whether it was pulled down in front or in back. It had to be pulled down in front for the vee to really come out. 

If one wanted to lie, one could only show images of Oswald in which the vee did not manifest and either claim or imply that it never occurred. But, that would just be the blood talking. 

His stretched t-shirt sank mighty low at times, and one of those times was when he was standing in the doorway.

Oh yes, it sank down low at times. 

Yes, that vee came out at times, and there is no denying it. 

And the punk has the nerve to say that I claim Oswald and Lovelady were dressed alike. No, punk. I'm claiming that they dressed nothing alike. But look at these two:

Well, whoever they are, they are obviously dressed alike. And since it's Oswald on the left, and since bpunk claims it is Lovelady on the right, he IS claiming that Oswald and Lovelady were dressed alike. How much more alike can two men be dressed than this?  So, why won't bpunk admit it? It's because bpunk is a liar: a professional liar. He is paid to lie. bpunk works for a cyber shill company. He is a cyber shill by profession. How do you think he pays for his $1500 suits? It is his job to lie. 

I realize that the minions of the state are working the JFK coverup just as vigorously in 2014 as they did in 1964. That's because there is every bit as much at stake. And the big question is: will they kill again to stifle Oswald innocence and JFK truth? 

I don't doubt it, and I live with the awareness of it, the risk of it, every day of my life. I have been threatened twice so far. If I am killed, the OIC website will go on. I have arranged for that, and without relying on any personal contact. It's out of any individual's hands. And, the site will announce my death and the circumstances of it on the home page. And there is more, but I'm not telling.