Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

On the right, ink got removed, punk.

It got lifted off the page.

And there is no reason to think that Lovelady would have blended his arrow with Frazier's rather than make it distinct because nobody would do that. 

And there is no reason to think that Lovelady would have blended his arrow with Frazier's rather than make it distinct because nobody would do that. 

And there is no reason to think that Lovelady would have blended his arrow with Frazier's rather than make it distinct because nobody would do that. 

And there is no reason to think that Lovelady would have blended his arrow with Frazier's rather than make it distinct because nobody would do that. 


We also know from the testimonies that your claim can't be right because if Joseph Ball had gotten what he wanted- a second arrow pointing to Doorman- he would have said so. He would have identified it clearly, as he did with Danny Arce.  

Mr. BALL. Just to identify it clearly, the man on the steps---well, you see the man on the steps, do you not? 
Mr. ARCE. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. He is a white man, isn't he?
Mr. ARCE. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. And you see his picture just above the picture of two colored people, is that correct; would you describe it like that?
Mr. ARCE. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. I am not going to mark this purposely because other witnesses have to see it.
Mr. ARCE. Yes.
Mr. BALL. Did you say that is Billy Lovelady?
Mr. ARCE. Yes, that is Billy Lovelady.
Mr. BALL. Now, there is only one face that is clearly shown within the entrance-way of the Texas School Book Depository Building, isn't there?
Mr. ARCE. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. And only one face of a person who is standing on the steps of the Depository Building entrance?
Mr. ARCE. Yeah.
Mr. BALL. And that one man you see there---
Mr. ARCE. Yes, that's Billy Lovelady. 

The same was true with Buell Frazier. 

Mr. FRAZIER - Because Billy, like I say, is two or three steps down in front of me.
Mr. BALL - Do you recognize this fellow?
Mr. FRAZIER - That is Billy, that is Billy Lovelady.
Mr. BALL - Billy?
Mr. FRAZIER - Right
Mr. BALL - Let's take a marker and make an arrow down that way. That mark is Billy Lovelady?
Mr. FRAZIER - Right.
Mr. BALL - That is where you told us you were standing a moment ago.
Mr. FRAZIER - Right.
Mr. BALL - In front of you to the right over to the wall?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Is this a Commission exhibit?
We will make this a Commission Exhibit No. 369.
(The document referred to was marked Commission Exhibit No. 369 for identification.)
Mr. BALL - That is written in. The arrow marks Billy Lovelady on Commission's Exhibit No. 369. 

Of course, Frazier is so full of shit, he reeks. How could Lovelady be Doorman who is clearly on the top level and also be two or three steps down in front of Frazier? But, the point is: why didn't Joseph Ball do all that clear identifying with Lovelady after he drew his arrow?

Mr. BALL - Take a pen or pencil and mark an arrow where you are.
Mr. LOVELADY - Where I thought the shots are?
Mr. BALL - No; you in the picture.
Mr. LOVELADY - Oh, here (indicating).
Mr. BALL - Draw an arrow down to that; do it in the dark. You got an arrow in the dark and one in the white pointing toward you. Where were you when the picture was taken?
Mr. LOVELADY - Right there at the entrance of the building standing on the the step, would be here (indicating).
Mr. BALL - You were standing on which step?
Mr. LOVELADY - It would be your top level.
Mr. BALL - The top step you were standing there?
Mr. LOVELADY - Right.
Mr. BALL - Now, when Gloria came up you were standing near Mr. Shelley? 

At no time did Joseph Ball verbally identify the man to whom Lovelady drew his arrow as Doorman. Why? Because Lovelady didn't draw his arrow to Doorman. If he had, Ball would have verbally acknowledged it, as he did with both Arce and Frazier.

As for other marks, indeed, why are they there on CE 369?

On the right is the HSCA version of the Altgens doorway, considered the best, and on the left is CE 369.  Just compare. Did they add mottling marks to the black space to distract and confuse? But, only one mark looks like an arrowhead. 

  The fact is that there is nothing else but this and Frazier's arrow.

That is it. There is nothing else. We have run out of arrows.

And let's remember that we made the identification of Black Hole Man as Lovelady BEFORE we discovered the arrow, that there are other things IDing him as Lovelady. 

Notice the same folded bottom of the shirt that is worn out on both. I have an arrow pointing to it on Black Hole Man. And why did they blacken out Black Hole Man's face? There is no way that much shadow could be created by his hands. For instance, his hands would not create as much shadow as the rim of a hat.

The guy on the right was watching the motorcade from Houston Street, and he is believed to be a CIA spook. I forget his name. James Richards knows who he is and named him. He's one of those anti-Castro guys. But regardless, notice that the rim of his hat only shades his eyes. The rest of his face remains in bright light. And that hat rim would extend more shade than the hands atop Black Hole Man's head. They blackened out his face. I said: they blackened Black Hole Man's face. And hence his name: Black Hole Man. 

What I love about this whole process is that I get to expound and elaborate and expand. And I love talking about this. So, let's keep it up.  Billy Lovelady was Black Hole Man in the doorway. He said he was "on your top level" and since he can't possibly be Doorman since Doorman was Oswald, Lovelady HAS to be Black Hole Man since there is no else on the top level. There are only two men up there: Doorman and Black Hole Man. Doorman was Oswald, and that is beyond doubt. And that means Black Hole Man must be Lovelady.