Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

It is not important to me to get credit for any discoveries, but I do believe it's true that I am the first person to notice that Doorman is wearing Oswald's distinctive t-shirt with the sunken, v-shaped margin. And I say it with regret because others should have noticed it before I did. 

There is no chance that Lovelady's t-shirt looked like that because it didn't look like that- not in any picture of him. And the vee on Doorman is definitely the junction of his skin and the t-shirt. It is not shadow over the t-shirt. We can see the effect of shadow over the t-shirt because on both sides of the vee, the t-shirt looks grey due to shadow. The area that looks black is just his skin. Why does it look so dark? It was very polarized film, and naked skin out of direct sunlight got pushed very dark, including Caucasian skin. 

Oswald stretched his t-shirt by tugging on it; it was a habit of his. And this looked to be a very old and tattered t-shirt which had succumbed to a lot of tugging and stretching. It was stretched way out of shape, and it was quite threadbare as well. 

So, who could be wearing Oswald's unique t-shirt except Oswald? 

Then, below the t-shirt is the phony image of Roy Lewis which was put in there. Roy Lewis was not turned that direction, and he was not looking that direction, at that time. We know from the Wiegman film that he was turned and looking west at that time: the opposite direction. And below his phony face, you see Doorman's cuff going in front of Roy Lewis' neck, which of course is impossible since Doorman was way above him, behind him, and east of him. Then look what is below Doorman's cuff: a weird shamrock-shaped form. 

What the hell is that? What do you think it is? I can tell you what it is supposed to be. It is supposed to be the torso of Roy Lewis. But, where are his arms? Why don't they show? And how could such a small structure represent his body? Do you know how big Roy Lewis was? He was about 6'3" and probably weighed 220 pounds. So, what is that weird thing, and what happened to his massive body? What it is is just a substitute for his body that they thought they could get away with. But, they were wrong. 

Why'd they put Roy Lewis in there? And keep in mind that he was there; it's just that he was out of view to Altgens, or at least mostly out of view to Altgens. But, they put him in there probably to hide the hand-clasping. That shot of Roy Lewis was taken hours later by Phil Willis. They were out to cover up Oswald's handclasping because they knew it could easily give Oswald away since it was his frequent habit to stand like that. and they may also have wished to hide the tattered, torn appearance of his shirt, which also would have given him away. 

But, you can see that the right collars are a spot-on match between them (and that is left to us). 

So, on each of their right sides (our left), you've got the flap of the collar which looks identical, and then you've got a small vertical fold which also looks identical on both. That is a spot-on match. And the same would be true on the other side too, which is their left side. Just imagine if they hadn't stuck Black Tie Man in there. He definitely wasn't there. And look at the distortion to Doorman's left ear that resulted from it. Compare his left ear to his right ear.

Look at that monstrosity! What is the innocent explanation for that bulged swelling and gross distortion on the left side of his face? What happened to his left ear? His right ear on our left looks normal, but what about his left ear? 

On his left side, the configuration of Doorman's shirt would have looked exactly like what we see on Oswald with the flattened collar, the notch, the button hook, and then the long lapel.

It would have screamed Oswald so loud they'd have heard it in Poughkeepsie. But, why they thought that covering it up would prevent us from IDing Oswald is a mystery to me. We can still see the same open sprawl and the same lay of the shirt on both. 

Are people completely out of their minds to think that Lovelady was decked out exactly the same as Oswald on 11/22/63? Stop the nonsense. That is Oswald's outfit. It can't not be him. 

This has reached the point where the people who are fighting us are doing it out of stubbornness, where they just refuse to admit a very obvious thing, that that is Oswald wearing Oswald's clothes. It is beyond certain. Or I could say that it is as certain as any fact in the known universe, bar none. No exceptions. Nothing is more certain than this. 

And that is why we are truly living in a Bizarro World. And it is really quite amazing that anyone has the nerve to dispute that that is Oswald.