Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

It makes no sense to put any stock in what Frazier said about Lovelady's location because in March 1964, this is what Frazier said about Lovelady's location. 

He drew an arrow to Doorman and said that he was Lovelady. And we know where Doorman was: he was on the top level and very close to the center of the doorway. So, if Frazier was saying that Doorman was Lovelady, then that is where he placed Lovelady. And the fact that Frazier has changed his story countless times since doesn't help matters. The fact is that Frazier has been wrong for 51 years in what he has been saying about Lovelady, and likewise, he has been wrong for 51 years in what he has been saying about Doorman. So, why put any stock in anything that Frazier says?