Monday, December 8, 2014

I believe that the Establishment is field-testing the idea of scrapping the official story of the JFK assassination and replacing it with one in which LBJ is the culprit.

They want to retain Oswald as shooter but not as a lone-nut gunman. Instead, it would be that LBJ got Nixon to get Ruby to get Oswald to kill Kennedy.  

Why do I say that they are field-testing it? It's because the idea of LBJ being behind the assassination does get coverage in the mainstream media. 

Here, for example, is a story about it from Fox News. That's Fox News. The one that hosts Bill O'Reilly.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/08/08/jacqueline-kennedy-reportedly-believed-lyndon-b-johnson-behind-husbands/


Now, do you think Fox News is ever going to carry a story about Oswald in the doorway? There isn't a snowball's chance in Hell. 

What is happening here is that they are more than willing to throw Johnson and Nixon to the dogs. After all, they were both corrupt former Presidents, Lyin' Lyndon and Tricky Dick. And they are both long dead, and that is especially good. If they blame it all on them, it will spare the institutions and the agencies of government, including the CIA and the FBI.  It's a matter of containment; of damage control.  

However, they will never include George Bush Sr. because he's still alive, and him they want to move to the Pantheon. Look at all the coverage his son's glowing book about him is getting. Plus, his other son is going to run for President, and he is very much a team player- meaning that he's on their team. So, they will never besmirch the name of George Bush. 

But, if they have to ditch the lone-nut idea, that's what I think they are going to do: sacrifice Johnson and Nixon. 

And the lone-nut idea is a ridiculous idea. How could Oswald want to kill Kennedy when he never said a critical or unkind word about Kennedy in his life? He borrowed Kennedy's book from the library and read it. He started reading James Bond novels because he heard that Kennedy liked them. And, according to Marina, he vigorously defended Kennedy to her relatives at family gatherings in Russia. She said that Lee liked and admired Kennedy. 

And the idea that he did it on account of Cuba policy is a joke. In fact, it reminds me of a joke, one that is going around right now:

Barrack Obama has got an excellent life insurance policy. His name is Joe Biden.

If Oswald didn't like Kennedy's Cuba policy, why the hell would he kill him when LBJ was a much more aggressive hawk against Castro and Cuba than Kennedy was? On the contrary, he should have been out to protect every hair on Kennedy's head. 

So, coming up with a motive for Oswald to kill Kennedy is a tough proposition, and in the end, they fall back on the idea that Oswald was crazy, that he was a disgruntled failure, and that he killed Kennedy just for the notoriety, just to become famous, that is, infamous. 

Well, in that case, why didn't he take credit for it? Why didn't he admit to killing Kennedy? Why did he keep denying it, over and over again? Once I counted the number of times that Oswald denied killing Kennedy on tape, where with our own ears we could hear him denying it, and I believe the number I came up with was 11. And do you know that these denials have been subjected to voice analysis, in effect, a lie detector test, and Oswald passed? 

So, Oswald had no motive to kill Kennedy, and even the "he was crazy" motive doesn't hold up. 

So, he lacked a motive, but he even lacked the opportunity. What evidence is there that Oswald even knew that JFK's motorcade would be passing the building that day? He asked Junior Jarman why people were gathering on the sidewalk out in front of the TSBD on 11/22. Jarman told him that the President would be riding by. Oswald didn't know. 

The presumption is that he learned about the motorcade route by reading the newspaper. But, it is an awfully big and unwarranted assumption. He didn't subscribe to any newspaper, and there is no evidence that he bought any. He was known to read the newspaper sometimes on his lunch break, but nobody knows that he read that. It's not like the motorcade route was a headline. It was more like the fine print.  Oswald would sometimes peruse the newspaper during his lunch break. But, did he do it on the day or days that the motorcade route was published? Or, as I should say, did he do it on the day or days that the motorcade route was published correctly? As far as I know, the Dallas Morning News didn't publish it correctly until the morning of Friday, November 22, which was obviously too late for Oswald to act on. 

Wouldn't you think that if they were going to make this claim that they would isolate a certain, particular newspaper that did have the motorcade route listed correctly and which was, in fact, available at the TSBD, and for which there was a witness who specifically saw Oswald read that particular newspaper? There is nothing like that. And there is concrete evidence that Oswald did not know the President would be driving by.

And the whole idea that Oswald was insane is totally made up. It's why they concocted the whole phony Walker shooting attempt story. And they had a second one, that Oswald was going to shoot Nixon when he came to Dallas in April 1963 and that the only thing that prevented it was Marina locking Oswald in the bathroom for the duration of Nixon's visit. Except that Nixon never made a visit to Dallas in April 1963. That was Johnson. So, they got the wrong Vice President into their story. Oops. 

Here is another Fox News report which highlights Roger Stone's LBJ-bashing book, The Man Who Killed Kennedy:

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/fox-and-friends/as-seen-on/man-who-killed-kennedy-roger-stone

Now, how is it that Fox News has never acknowledged the existence of James Douglass' excellent book, JFK and the Unspeakable? How come they have never acknowledged the existence of John Armstrong's superb book, Harvey and Lee? It's because the Establishment is seriously considering throwing Johnson (and Nixon) to the wolves.  That's their backup plan when even they can see that all is lost for the official story. 






No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.