Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Forget it, Unger. Doorman is on the top level. And for Lovelady to be Doorman, he would have to be on the top level. 

Roy Lewis was 6'3". Oswald was 5'9". Yet, Doorman is towering over Roy Lewis. Why? Because Doorman is on the top level.

And what about Black Tie Man who is behind Doorman? Obviously, they were on the same level, and there was only one level, the top level. 

And we know from the Wiegman film that Doorman was standing on the top level.

Do you really want to argue that Doorman was anywhere but the top level? 

You better think about it very carefully, Unger.  And think back to all those debates we had on Education Forum when people like Craig Lamson and Albert Doyle were saying that Unger was on the top level and grabbing the median handrail. He's not doing that, but he is on the top level, and everybody admitted it. 

Plus, if you're going to quote Frazier, he first said that he was one step down from the top. And that is exactly the relationship we see in the Wiegman film in which Frazier is visible.

But get something straight, Unger: we have the images. We can see where Doorman is. And we can see that he is on the top level. That is true in the Altgens photo and in the Wiegman film. And they were very closely correlated in time. Nothing trumps the images, Unger. Nothing. And certainly not anybody's lip-flapping. That's just for reinforcement. The images rule. And the images say that Doorman was on the top level. And Black Hole Man is also on the top level, as Lovelady said he was on the top level. So, it all adds up for Lovelady being Black Hole Man on the top level and Oswald being Doorman on the top level.