Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes, the hand is only partially hidden from side to side. And specifically, it's the right side that is hidden.

The guy's head is hiding the right side of the hand. And that's true whether you think it's his hand or somebody else's- and it doesn't matter. For the record, I think it's his. 

But, there is NOTHING there obstructing the view through the length of the hand on the side that we see. In other words, we should be able to see the visible fingers all the way to their tips. 

But, we don't. Those fingers, the ones that we see, are blunted. They're snipped off.  He would have to be an amputee to be configured like that. But, the point is that the blurriness doesn't matter, and the fact that his hand is partially hidden doesn't matter. You keep repeating "out of focus" and "partially hidden" as if they are cards in your hand scoring you points. They're not. You've got nothing. Both are irrelevant. Both are immaterial. 

And when I say it doesn't look anatomical, I mean that it doesn't look anatomically correct, that it is not in accordance with normal human anatomy. It's an abbreviated medical expression which I didn't invent. I've seen it used that way for decades.

Jackie's wrist and hand are overlying the guy's fingers, Backes.

And that is absolutely certain because his fingers could not possibly be that short. It wouldn't be anatomical.