Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Yes, I've made some mistakes. But, at least I admit when I have. 

And, I get it that it's street signs that are obstructing the doorway on our right. Why did I suggest laser lights? Because it seemed doubtful to me that small street signs could loom so large in the image. And, I still have my doubts about it. But, let's say that it's true, and that's all there is to it, that it wasn't an attempt to hide anyone who was standing on that side of the doorway. There is, nevertheless, ample reason to believe that this Hughes film is altered and fake- even without considering those street signs. 

First, look on the left. There are two men standing there. There is Roy Lewis below, and a man standing above him, presumably Doorman. Here it is in different coloring. 

The guy above, who is apparently dressed in Doorman's garb with the open brown shirt and the exposed white t-shirt, that wasn't Oswald, it wasn't Lovelady, it was nobody. Nobody was there. All you have to do is watch the Wiegman film to see that Roy Lewis was by himself along that wall.

Doorman was in the center of the doorway. He was not hovering above Roy Lewis. So, why did they stick that other guy there in Hughes? It came from misinterpreting the Altgens photo.

It looks like they're close, but they're not. They are apart exactly as they were in Wiegman. And NOBODY can argue with that because Wiegman and Altgens were too close in time. How close? Practically simultaneous, and too close to allow for such movement.

Hughes came earlier, so theoretically, Oswald could have been hovering above Roy Lewis and then had time to shift back to the top of the landing in the center before the other images were rendered. But, it is arbitrary and capricious to assert that. It is just a futile attempt to avoid asserting the possibility and likelihood of alteration- as if that's off the table and can't be considered. 

Doorman was Oswald, and they wouldn't have allowed him to go any farther out than he did. Remember, they were framing him. How could they do that if he was going to wander off into Dealey Plaza? How could they say he was up on the 6th floor locking and loading on Kennedy? So, I am absolutely sure that Bill Shelley and perhaps others in the doorway were there to block Oswald from going out there. And you know that Roy Lewis had nothing to do with it, and big as he was, he wasn't going to stop Oswald from leaving. So basically, Oswald, as we see him in Hughes, has got a green light to take off- one that they would never have granted. So, that is a bogus image, and it's from the same frame with the disputed street signs. So, even if the street signs are valid, it doesn't mean the film isn't bogus in other ways. And another way is this:

That freaky guy on the left is supposed to be Lovelady in the Hughes film AFTER the assassination, hovering on the EAST side of the doorway, which is something Lovelady NEVER said he did. The other guy is also supposed to be Lovelady- in the squad room. Same guy? Same shirt? Why does that figure on the left look so freaky? It's because he was an unstable image. He was inserted into the film, and it took a second or two for his image to stabilize. Eventually, it did, but this stands as evidence of the forgery. 

So, the Hughes film is DEFINITELY among the JFK films that were altered and frauded, and theu also include, that I know of, the Zapruder, Wiegman, Martin, Towner, and the DPD films of Oswald, including Lovelady in the Squad room. That is a whole hell of a lot of photographic fraud that is never going to go away. The JFK assassination is the most photographically altered event in the history of the world.