Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

No, Backes. The FBI correctly determined that Oswald rode the bus and cab, but they did not determine, correctly or incorrectly, that Lovelady was the Doorway Man. He wasn't, and they knowingly lied in saying that he was. 

The Montreal Gazette article states the following, and I quote:

"Many others, however, have insisted to to the commission investigating the assassination that the man (in the doorway) is Oswald."

It means that they gave witness to the fact that he was Oswald. 

That the word "witness" doesn't appear is irrelevant. What matters is that they recognized the Man in the Doorway as Oswald and said so. They identified him as Oswald. That's what matters.  

And the key word is "many" because it means not only more than one but more than a few. 

Let's remember that all this time, the bloodied have been saying, over and over, that nobody reported Oswald being in the doorway. But, this statement contradicts that, saying that "many" others "insisted" it was him. "Insisted" means that they stated adamantly that it was him in the doorway. Not just that it could be him, or might be him, but that it was him, definitely him. And, the one who is bullshitting about this is YOU. 

And what, are you denying now that Harold Wiegman was an advocate of Oswald in the doorway? Are you suggesting that he changed his mind about that? That he conceded that Doorman was Lovelady afterall? Is that what you're saying, Backass????  

You filthy, disgusting pig. You are a disgrace. You are the lowest scum to ever pretend to be a researcher. You are such a liar. You are also a traitor. And you are a criminal. And you are NEVER going to be invited to speak at a JFK conference again in your life.