Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

So, Backass and his friend with the nickname U-ne-go-tso-duh, (it's from Tsalagi) refuse to say if this guy looks 26.

I'm not surprised, but what does it say about their honesty and lack thereof? If that guy is older than 26, then he can't be Lovelady. And if he's not Lovelady, it means they faked his presence in the film. And if they faked it, it's because Lovelady must have worn a short-sleeved striped shirt, as he claimed. Ipso facto, Lovelady could not possibly be Doorman, and he wasn't. 

And regarding Lovelady's shirt in this image, it's as much a problem for you as it is for me.

 How could it transition from being squared off from presumably being tucked in to hanging out in an instant? Try it yourself. If it goes from being tucked in in front to hanging out in back, there is a gradual transition not a sudden shift.

That's making a right angle. It is going from horizontal to vertical in a sharp angle, a perfect 90 degree angle. How could a shirt do that? It couldn't. 

So, I'm not going to worry about it, U-ne-go-tso-duh, because it's as much a problem for you as it is for me.