Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I've said before that this Lovelady figure is a distorted image. He was inserted into the film, but his image distorted for the first second or so, and that's why it looks so weird. 

You see the Lovelady figure close to the east column. What happened to his plaid shirt?  It distorted because of what they did to put him in there. It took a while for him to settle down, but eventually he did. 

Somebody actually turned him into a cartoon, as you can see on the right. That is what you call a bad photoshop job. A guy named Albert Doyle, who we don't see or hear from any more, actually tried to pass that off as photographic, when it's really art.

But, the guy on the left looks alright, right? But, there's one problem:

  
Supposedly, "Lovelady" walked toward the center of the doorway, but if you look closely, you can see there is still a weird figure there next to the east column. Who is that?

What, is that someone else who moved in there after "Lovelady" vacated the spot?

Here, watch it in the Hughes from 1:35 to 1:45:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kA0t5zvaW70

Right about 1:40, it looks like there's a Koala bear in the frame.

I kid you not. That's what you see right at 1:40. Watch it yourself at the link above. I'm not kidding. What is it? It's distortion left over from when they stuck that fake Lovelady in there. So essentially, you've got two Lovelady's there in plain view. 

Look: it's FAKE. Or, like Harold Weisberg, you could say that it's STAGED. All of these Lovelady sightings from 11/22/63 are fake. They were all done later, years later, and in some cases, decades later; inserting Lovelady figures into the films. And it was all done for the purpose of showcasing Lovelady in a plaid shirt, which he didn't wear on 11/22, in order to claim that he was Doorman, even though Doorman's shirt wasn't the least bit plaid. It was all a comedy of errors, but, it's no laughing matter since it involved vicious killers and still does.