 |
On Sunday, 31 May 2015 03:53:05 UTC+10, Ralph Cinque wrote:
> http://oswaldinthedoorway.
That is not a graphic by John McAdams, that is a graphic by Jerry Organ.> http://oswaldinthedoorway.
Once again you simply DON'T KNOW what you're talking about, Ralph.
Yet it doesn't stop you going around making WILD accusations, does it?
Your organization is a CROCK!
Informative Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
Ralph Cinque:
Yeah, Brennan. I heard the story of it. Jerry Organ made it at the request of John McAdams, and John is the one who promoted it.
That collage, which attempts to prove that Doorman was Lovelady not Oswald, includes no image of Oswald in his entirety, clothes included.
But, when we look at Doorman, we're looking at two things: we are looking at a man, and we are looking at a wardrobe. Organ and McAdams included that image of "Lovelady" in his plaid shirt, so why not include an image of Oswald dressed as well?
In other words, they were as bad as the FBI, which on the evening of Nov 23, went to Billy Lovelady to show him the Altgens photo. But, why didn't they do the same with Oswald? He was still alive.
If you have an image that you think could be one of two men, wouldn't you show it to both of them? Millions of people from all over the world thought it was Oswald in the doorway. So, why not get Oswald's opinion about it as well as Lovelady's? Wouldn't any honest investigator, bent on discovering the truth, do that?
Why couldn't John McAdams have had Jerry Organ include an image of Oswald as he really was? Meaning: fully dressed. An image such as this:
McAdams and Organ didn't do it, and I'm saying it was downright dishonest not to do it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.