Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes, you're really too stupid to be doing this. Here are Altgens' and Willis' lines of sight to show how different they were.

Here is the doorway unoccupied. It's not exactly Altgens' angle, but it is from the west side. Can you or can you not see that the west wall, meaning the inside of the wall running back to the glass is not visible, while the east wall is?

So, we are seeing the inside of the east wall, but the west side is cut off to us, as it was to Altgens. Well, Roy Lewis was against that west wall. We can demonstrate it graphically this way:

Keep in mind that that diagonal line I drew dividing what Altgens could see from what he could not see is NOT in dispute. Above it's pretty close to a straight-on shot. It's slightly from the west, but not much. So, if we were standing there and we moved eastward, we would start seeing the inside of the west wall. And if we moved westward, we would see more of the east wall while the west would be further obscured. You see the wall opposite to the direction that you go. 

Again, this is not in dispute, Backes. You are really being a Caveman if you can't see it. In fact, I take it back because a Caveman could probably see it. 

Why don't you open up your page to comments, Backes? I'd like to see which of your minions is willing to support you on this.

Let me give you a hint, Backes: People smarter than yourself have realized that the ONLY way to argue for the legitimacy of Roy Lewis in the Altgens photo is to claim that he moved- that he moved into Altgens visible zone, that he moved east, that he relocated, that he picked himself up and went to a different spot in the doorway than we see him in Wiegman. That's the only chess move you've got in this game. But, it's still hopeless. It's checkmate. Because Roy Lewis didn't move. He stayed put.