Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I have provided a lot of evidence that Jack Ruby's hair in photographs was tampered with, often giving him the appearance of giving him full coverage on top, and in some cases, a full head of hair. 

It's really strange that we do it because they also claimed that this was Jack Ruby on 11/22/63:

How do they explain such a contradiction? They don't. They just ignore it. And by the way, the guy above is not Ruby, and it wasn't even 11/22. It was 11/23, and we know that because that is the Saturday paper the man is reading on the right. But now, I have evidence that they altered Ruby's hair not just in photos but in films. This was a hearing in which Ruby was bemoaning to the judge about how his 9 hour polygraph test results were withheld because he was crazy. Look how his hair fluctuates. 

What nonsense. They messed with his hair like crazy. Back and forth, back and forth. Why'd they do it? I presume they did it because the Garage Shooter seems to have a lot of hair. 

That isn't just hair growing on his neck. That is hair coming down from on top. And it isn't even real. That's Bookhout, and he was wearing a toupee'. He was an FBI agent, not one of the Beatles. But, look what happened in the KRLD film.

So, there you see that his hat came off.  But, is it a real and undoctored image? But then, Detective Miller rushes in and covers his head with something.

What the hell did he put over his head? It's hard to tell, but it looks to be black. 

Why would they do all this if Ruby really shot Oswald? They wouldn't. They couldn't. He didn't.