Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

What is the 4 second mark, Backes? It means that it occurs within the 4th second after the film started.

This frame is much clearer than what we see in the extant film online, and it tells me that somewhere, there is a version of the Wiegman film that is that clear throughout. 

And no, Backes, you can't blame the blurriness on Wiegman running because even when he was riding smoothly in the car, the film was blurry.

This was before Wiegman got out, when he was still riding high. Do you understand that, Backes? It's still blurry. 

And, are you unable to count to 3? There was a first shot that missed. That's 1. There was a shot that hit Kennedy in the back but did not exit. That's 2. And there was the shot to his throat from the front. That's 3. It means there were at least 3 shots fired by the time of the Altgens photo. There may have been more, but there certainly weren't less. 

You'll argue with anything I say just because I say it, won't you, Backes? 

And now you're denying that frames were removed from the Z film to hide the slowing and stopping of the limo? Ever hear of Jack White? I would say at this point in time that over half the JFK community believes in Zapruder film alteration, and hiding the halting of the vehicle was a cardinal thing that they did to it. 

For goodness sake, get informed and become aware:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Am4qdl9PTA


And you call me an idiot for calling the Lovelady figure (he wasn't really Lovelady) a Cigar Store Indian? You called him a Zen meditator mourning the loss of Kennedy.

And finally, these two frames were taken at the same time, and I mean within 1 second. 

And now you're questioning whether the man on the left was Roy Lewis? Who else could he be, Backes?