Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 Bob Burgess posted a video with the top-left image of Ruby, and he pointed out that Ruby's hair looks the same as the Garage Shooter. However, it's fake. Somebody photoshopped it. If you look closely, you'll see that that is an oblong strip that was added. It's like a duckbill that was pasted in there. 

Below it on the left is Ruby's mugshot from the DPD, and you can see that his hair in back was tapered in the usual way that barbers do. He was probably a couple weeks out from his last haircut, since his neck looks dirty with the scruffy hair growth that men get between haircuts. But, it's tapered in the usual way; there was no duckbill. What we see top-left is fake. 

However, even the mugshot has fake hair because Ruby had very little hair on top, and a few of his images from his trial showed it very well. The doctoring of Ruby's hair was a relentless process since James Bookhout wore a thick wig in the garage. But, in anticipation of someone claiming that Ruby lost a lot of hair between the shooting and the trial, I have included an image of him from the 1960 Easter parade in Dallas, which was 3 1/2 years before. And even in that one, the little tuft you see in front is another artifact that was added. Look how ridiculous it is. If Ruby had a thick tuft right in front and a bald lake behind it, wouldn't he grow the tuft out to get as much coverage from it as he could? 

Finally, I did include, lower-right, an image of him from his trial, in which he had long strands combed back. Fake, fake, fake. 

If you consider the whole panoply of Ruby's hair, it's like a circus or carnival. It was a non-stop process of filling in his hair, in various ways, to various degrees, until the day he died. Why? Because the Garage Shooter had so much hair (Bookhout's wig) that they had to bolster Ruby's hair. But, it was done by individual artists, one at a time, and it never came out the same way twice. And some got carried away to ridiculous degrees. I wonder if the artist who did this realized that he was an accessory to murder. 

The bottom line is that Ruby was practically bald on top. 

But, this latest subterfuge from Burgess may be quite new because they are never done altering images from the JFK assassination. 

That particular video was deliberately degraded, blasting the contrast and lighting, so that the malfeasance would go unnoticed. There are other versions of it that don't have the duckbill.

The JFK assassination is the most photographically altered event in human history, and the work is never done. Like Prometheus, John F. Kennedy is killed and re-killed every day. And the same is true of Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby, both of whom were completely, totally innocent.