Saturday, December 21, 2013

Let's look at this statement of MacRae's again. 

What exactly are you trying to say, MacRae? Are you saying that Mary Bledsoe was a phony witness? Are you saying that she was coerced to tell a story that wasn't true? That she was lying?

Is that what you're saying? Because if that's what you are saying, you need to explain why Mary Bledsoe cooperated with it. Why should she have done that? Why should she have agreed to do it? What do you think they threatened her with in order to get her to cooperate?  Do you think she really was Oswald's former landlady or do you think they made that up too?

So, you don't like her testimony? You think it was one of the worst? It bothers you that she had a lawyer there and a written statement? Fine. But just explain HOW she got involved in the whole thing and WHY she got involved in the whole thing. You don't get to gloss over that- not on my watch. I hold people accountable. Now you finish your account. How was Mary Bledsoe recruited? How did they persuade her to do it? How did the whole fake, phony thing go down? And why would they bother when, according to you, Oswald locked and loaded on the 6th floor and then went on to kill Tippit? Was this a case of framing a guilty man? Do tell.  

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.