In his Warren Commission testimony, he first said that he was one step down from the top, next to the handrail. But later, he was specifically asked by Joseph Ball why he wasn't seen in the Altgens photo. And that's when he started with the "back in the shadows" bull shit.
Frazier was one of the first ones out there, and the whole idea was to watch the motorcade- to see it. So WHY would he back in the shadows? That would have been a good question for Spence to ask.
Spence: Why were you back in the shadows?
Frazier: I dunno.
Spence: Didn't it restrict your view?
Frazier: I guess.
Spence: You were there to watch the motorcade, right?
Frazier: Yeah.
Spence: It wasn't all that crowded. Wasn't there a lot of room, especially on the west side?
Frazier: Yeah.
Spence: So, why didn't you come forward?
Fraizer: I dunno. I was back in the shadows.
This the segment from the propaganda film, Four Days in November, in which Frazier recreated his drive to work that morning:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIre8cupXfg
In it, Frazier said that he and Oswald talked as he drove to work, and he mentioned two things that they talked about: children and the weather. Frazier said there was a twinkle in Oswald's eye when he talked about playing with his kids and how much he enjoyed it. And then they discussed the weather, mainly how miserable a day it was sizing up to be: cold, drizzly, hazy, miserable. So, why would Oswald have the expectation that Kennedy was going to be riding around in an open convertible?
But, think about it: when they got to the point where they were talking about the miserable weather, wouldn't one of them have wondered aloud: "I wonder how it's going to affect the President's visit."
Think about it from Oswald's point of view. He supposedly brought a rifle with which to shoot the President from a high window. It meant the President had to be in an open car. So, if bad weather was going to prevent that, it would mean there would be no opportunity. So, wasn't it on his mind? Wouldn't he have mentioned it? Not his plan to kill Kennedy but how the weather was going to affect the day's events?
And Frazier didn't bring it up because he didn't even know about the motorcade. He certainly didn't know that it was going to be passing the TSBD. It seems that most of the employees didn't. And of course Oswald didn't. He would only learn about it after he got to work from James Jarman.
In the recreation, Frazier said that when he went to the car, he saw the package, Oswald's package, and he said, "What's in the package, Lee?" And Oswald said, "Curtain rods."
But wait. Frazier told investigators that when Oswald first asked him about riding with him to Irving on the Thursday, Buell said, "You can ride with me any time you want to, but why do you need to go on a Thursday?" And that's when Lee told him all about the curtain rods, how he needed them for his room, and that there were some at Mrs. Paine's house which she wasn't using, so he was going to get them.
That was just the day before. So, Frazier already knew and expected that Lee would be carrying curtain rods. So, wouldn't he have said something like, "Those must be your curtain rods." And wouldn't Lee upon hearing Frazier ask him what they were have said something like, "These are those curtains rods I was telling you about."
In other words: HOW COULD BOTH OF THEM BE OBLIVIOUS TO THE PREVIOUS CONVERSATION?
You hear the announcer say that Oswald was in a hurry, but what was that based on?
Then you hear Frazier say that he had to "charge his battery." WHAT? They had just driven 20 miles on the freeway. If you left your lights on, and it ran down the battery, it's true that running the engine is going to help recharge it, but the engine just has to be running. They had just driven 20 miles on the freeway. So, whatever recharging was possible had already happened. The idea that him sitting there and reving the engine in neutral for a few more seconds was going to accomplish anything is ridiculous.
Frazier talked about it again in 2013, and again he said that he was "back up in the shadows."
But, it's ridiculous because there was no "up."
Frazier was still saying that the reason he wasn't visible in the Altgens photo is because he was back up in the shadows. It's nonsense. Impossible nonsense. There was very little back and no up.
Frazier said in 2013 that, after the assassination, he saw Oswald when he left through the back door, that he saw him walking down Houston Street towards Elm and then cross the street. Hmmm. It seems like that would have come up at the time. Weren't they all asked if they saw Oswald afterwards? And it seems hard to believe. We know that before he left work, Oswald gave two men directions to the pay phone, one of them being the future famed journalist Robert MacNeil. But, that was at the front door. So, why would Oswald leave through the back door only to have to walk back up Houston Street to Elm? It doesn't make sense.
Also, Frazier repeated in 2013 that Lee brought no lunch and said that he was going to buy his lunch. Frazier said that there were two sandwich shops nearby. But, if that's true, then why didn't he? Like everyone else, Oswald got off work at 11:45, which was 45 minutes before the motorcade arrived. So, if he brought no lunch, and there is no report of him eating anything at Mrs. Paine's house, why didn't he go buy some lunch? But, Oswald said that he brought his lunch, a cheese sandwich and an apple, which he ate in the domino room at a time when Jarman and Norman were milling around.
So, who are you going to believe, Oswald or Frazier? In Frazier's version, Oswald didn't even eat lunch.
Buell, your whole story sounds contrived. Come clean, Man! You know darn well that Oswald was standing in that doorway. You were standing right in front of him. You need to snap out of it and get on the side of truth and justice. Lee was your friend!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.