Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Have I ever mentioned how I despise people who use aliases? It's true.  

And it's the ones who use aliases to foster their vicious attacks on others whom I despise the most. 

Well, I have found another alias guy who is attacking Oswald in the doorway. Let's see what we know about this latest jerk: 

dreadsox

I was born in 1968. I am a huge Robert Kennedy fan. I was a history major at Eastern Nazarene College. I spent a great deal of my college life at the John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library researching in the archives. I make yearly trips to the archives and love to research.

Hmm. Sounds to me like just the kind of guy they would turn into an Op. I'm not saying they would give him any of the heavy lifting to do, such as committing interstate crimes, him not being a soldier and all. But, when it comes to lipflapping, yeah, I suppose he could do it as well as the others- which isn't saying much. 

But, let's take a look at his case against Oswald in the doorway. He put a nifty spin on it:

You are correct! He was outside just before he went home!

He claims that:

One of the pieces of evidence that is used in debates about the location of Lee Harvey Oswald at the time of the assassination is Captain Will Fritz’s handwritten notes about the interrogation of Lee Harvey Oswald.  An argument that has been around since the assassination is that Lee Oswald was on the steps in the famous Altgens-6 photograph.

One thing that is not debatable is that Cpt. Fritz’s notes do not support this argument.

The basis of his claim is the reference to the order of the remarks. But, I covered that in the new article, showing how there is NO WAY the order can be chronological.

The Fritz Notes from the first interrogation contains the following lines in this order:

Claims 2nd floor Coke when Off(icer) came in
To 1st floor had lunch
Out with Bill Shelley in front
Left work opinion nothing be done that day

Those lines are, obviously, not chronologically correct because Oswald certainly did not eat his lunch after the assassination. That is impossible. As Oswald later explained, he ate his lunch before the assassination in the domino room when Jarman and Norman were there. That was definitely before the motorcade arrived. But, in addition, there was no time for him to eat lunch afterwards. How could he possibly eat lunch after the assassination and do all that he needed to do before reaching home by 1:00? So, we know, with absolute certainty, that the notes are not chronological.

Next, Dreadsox quoted Fritz' claim that Oswald claimed to be eating lunch during the motorcade. 

In examining this, one can say that Fritz omitted that Oswald said he was out front with Shelley.  Some might even draw the conclusion that this is evidence that Fritz was in on it and ignored Oswald’s claims to have been out front.  This does not hold water.  FBI agent James W. Bookout was also in the room and present during the interrogation of Oswald.  His report reads, interestingly enough, closer to Fritz’s notes than Fritz’s report does.

Fritz, Bookhout, Hosty, Holmes- by that point in time they were ALL in on it, that is, the cover-up. I'm not talking about the murder but the cover-up- although if you told me that anyone who engaged in the cover-up was guilty of the murder as an accessory after the fact, I wouldn't fight with you.

But yes, the truth is that supporting the official story and convicting Oswald became a systemic obsession, and all of them- every fucking last one of those government bastards- did their part. They played their role. They knew exactly what was expected from them, and they delivered. 

Notice that Fritz NEVER cited "out with Bill Shelley in front" at all. Not in reference to the shooting; not in reference to the aftermath, not at all. Fritz was so afraid to bring it up, he was unwilling to even admit that he ever wrote it down, meaning, the existence of the notes.   

DreadSox posted James Bookhout's 11/24 statement in which he said that "at the time of the search of the TSBD" Oswald said he was in the lunch room sipping a Coke. 

But wait. That doesn't even make sense. Why would they ask him: Where were you during the search? They would have asked him: Where were you when it happened? What was Oswald's alibi for the shooting? That's what they would have asked him. That's what they had to ask him. But, Bookhout just left it out. Of course, not being smart or observant, DreadSox wasn't bothered.  

So, that filthy dirty Bookhout started with the aftermath, but he even got that wrong because Oswald did NOT get a Coke until after Baker and Truly left. And then after that, he did NOT eat lunch in the first floor lunch room because he had already eaten it in the first floor lunch room before the assassination. And there can be no doubt about that because there is no way he would have had the time. According to the Warren Commission, Oswald exited the building for good at 12:33. 

That's 12:33, you miserable, bloodsoaked Kennedy-killer. What, do you think he stuffed the food down his gullet like people do at hot dog eating contest?

And then, as I amply explained in the new article, Bill Shelley was not out in front at that time. He left. He left right away. He never returned to the front. There is NO CHANCE that Shelley was out front when Oswald left for home.

It is important to note that during this interrogation, Oswald had not made reference to eating lunch with two other employees in the depository which comes into play in another questioning session, quite different from the order he expressed here.

But, Oswald did name those employees the next time, and he named two employees who were definitely there: James Jarman and Harold Norman. So, out of 70 TSBD employees, he correctly named two who were there in the 12 to 12:20 time frame. There is no way that Oswald could have been lying about them because he could not have guessed that they were there. He had to see them.

Then DreadSox quoted Shelley:

Mr. BALL. On November 22, 1963, the day the President was shot, when is the last time you saw Oswald?
Mr. SHELLEY. It was 10 or 15 minutes before 12.
Mr. BALL. Where?
Mr. SHELLEY. On the first floor over near the telephone.
Mr. BALL. Did you ever see him again?
Mr. SHELLEY. At the police station when they brought him in.

And DreadSox added:

It is very clear, that Mr. Shelley was not with Lee Harvey Oswald on the steps of the School Book Depository Building before, during or after the assassination of President Kennedy. 

Oh, I get it: This twirp is casting Oswald as guilty. He's got him lying about everything. But, why would Oswald lie about chatting it up with Bill Shelley out front after the assassination? I mean: what would be the point of lying? Oswald wasn't stupid. What point is there in telling a lie which they can easily expose? 

Oswald wasn't lying. He never said he saw and talked to Bill Shelley after the assassination. He said he was in the doorway with Shelley during the assassination. And he said it because he assumed Shelley would confirm it. Of course, Shelley didn't, but that's because Shelley was in on the plot; he was a conspirator; he framed Oswald.  

DreadSox said that not a single witness placed Oswald at the doorway. Not true. Carolyn Arnold did. She said that shortly before the assassination, she saw Oswald between the glass door and the double doors, which means: at the doorway. That she told to an FBI agent on November 26, 1963. 

And, we are very, very lucky to have that because word spread very quickly- like wildfire- that NOBODY saw Oswald when they weren't supposed to. The FBI descended on that place like the fucking Gestapo. Capisce?

"Out with Bill Shelley in front" was DEFINITELY Oswald's alibi, and to those who say it wasn't, then you find me his fucking alibi in the Fritz Notes. Because: it's got to be there. They were accusing him of killing the President of the United States, and he said he didn't do it. What do you think was going to be the next thing to come out of his fucking mouth?????  HIS ALIBI!

So, if you don't think "out with Bill Shelley in front" was his alibi, then you find me his alibi.  You show me his alibi in the notations, above or below.  

You see anything else in there that sounds like an alibi besides "out with Bill Shelley in front"? And if you try to tell me that they talked to him for a whole fucking hour without soliciting his alibi or without him shouting it out spontaneously by his own free will, I tell you that you are nothing but a murdering, blood-soaked Kennedy-killer, that you murder him over and over, every day of your stinking, miserable life. What a fucking way to make a living!

Oswald was in the doorway during the shooting, and that is an absolute, inviolable, irrefutable, undeniable fact.

And just as absolute is the fact that that is where he said he was. He said he was "out with Bill Shelley in front" during the slaughter of JFK.