Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

In the JFK Op world, they don't care if you want to believe that Oswald was innocent. 

They just don't want you to believe that Oswald was innocent for the wrong reason, that is, a reason that is so compelling that it could really change the landscape and go viral if enough people heard about it, such as: Oswald in the doorway.

So, if you want to be an Oswald-innocent CT along the lines of, say, Josiah Thompson, where there is no Oswald in the doorway, no Altgens photo alteration, no Zapruder film alteration, nor any monkey business with the Moorman photo, etc., that's fine. They can tolerate you. They can do business with you. 

Anything that will keep the whole discourse in permanent confusion, permanent stalemate, permanent gridlock, is perfect for them. It's the best they can hope for. They know there are always going to be deniers. They know that there will always be those who renounce the official story. But, they want it to be a stalemate like the 38th parallel in Korea. 

But, some things are so powerful, they threaten that. For instance; Oswald in the doorway threatens it. So do the two Oswalds, Harvey and Lee. And if it was common knowledge that Oswald never went to Mexico City but was impersonated there, that would also, in and of itself, destroy the official story. How could a "lone nut" be someone that people are impersonating? 

Another example is the one we've been discussing lately: the post office conundrum. How could Oswald get the rifle when, if he signed as Lee Harvey Oswald he wasn't the legal owner of the rifle, and if he signed as Alek Hidell, he wasn't the legal owner of the PO box?  I really think the plotters just failed to consider that. They made it look like he ordered the rifle under an alias to make it look that he had wicked plans for it, but they forgot about the fact that the PO box to which it was sent was registered to Lee Harvey Oswald, not Alek Hidell.

And what makes it worse is that the rifle was sent not to Alek Hidell but "A. Hidell". 

A. Hidell could be Anthony Hidell, Angelo Hidell, Aaron Hidell, Andrew Hidell, Arthur Hidell, Ashton Hidell, Abdul Hidell, Abraham Hidell, Adlai Hidell, Abbott Hidell, Alexander Hidell, Alejandro Hidell, Aiden Hidell, and of course, Alec Hidell or Alek Hidell- and that's just off the top of my head. 

This was a firearm, a rifle, a high-powered rifle, and even then, they kept track of firearms that were purchased through the US Mail. So, would they have turned over a rifle to somebody without being absolutely sure he was the right recipient?

Could there have been two names on the post office box? NO! For there to be two names, each person has to sign. Both would have to be there and sign when the box was procured. OR, Oswald could have come in with Alek later and said, "I want to add my friend Alek Hidell to the box." 

But, how could Oswald do it alone? It was just him, remember? He couldn't do it. He was only one guy. So, there could not be two names on the PO box. There could only be one: Lee Harvey Oswald. Any gun sent to "A. Hidell" would have been sent back.

In the words of the vernacular, they just fucked up- in how they wrote that little script. And now they'd like to hush it up. They just want to be quiet about it and hope that it goes away. Well, it's not going anywhere.  

But, to know what scares them most- what they perceive to be the greatest threat to the official story- you just have to look at what they fight they most, what they devote the most manpower to. And there is nothing higher on the list than Oswald in the doorway, the mere mention of which sets off the fire alarm at Langley.