Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Let's return to that Stan Dane collage from the Prayer Man website:

Can you or can you not see that that image is highly distorted? Even if you claim that the figure in white is Frazier, can't you see that he's highly distorted? Look at the shape and dimensions of his head. Look at the angle of his neck and the angle of his body. He's like a fucking cartoon. You know he wasn't like that. You know he didn't stand like that.

So, on the left, you see what Frazier really looked like. You see the shape of his head, how it really was. You see how his neck was. You see how his posture was. And you realize that the image on the right is SO DISTORTED that it's like a FUCKING CARTOON.

Rather than being an image of Frazier it is more like a caricature of Frazier.  You know, a caricature? A funny, mocking cartoon? 

But, if the Frazier figure is that distorted, it means the whole image is that distorted. Therefore, what reliance can be put in the image of Prayer Man?

So, what we have with the Prayer Man image is an image of dubious origin where we can't see it in any intact film, and it's of dubious content since the figures in and at the doorway are completely different from a mere 10 seconds before, and it is so highly distorted that the key figures look like caricatures. And yet you want to use it to claim Oswald in the doorway in lieu of this?

You dirty rotten Kennedy-killing Ops.