Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

One more thing, James: 

If you had your integrity working, which you didn't, you could have written your letter to Viklund this way:

*   *      *    *    *     *    *   *    *    *     *     * 

Mr. Viklund,

I wish to address some of the points made by Ralph Cinque in response to your post about him. 

But first, I want to make it clear to you that I am NOT a supporter of yours. I am NOT a supporter of the official story of the JFK assassination. And, I very much support the innocence of Lee Harvey Oswald. I believe he was framed and innocent. I also support the Two Oswalds theory of John Armstrong, which includes that there were two Marguerites. 

So, you and I are miles apart and on opposite sides. However, I still have issues with Ralph Cinque which I wish to address and which you are welcome to publish. 

He demanded that I name the 7 witnesses who identified Lovelady as the Doorway Man in the Altgens photo, and now I am going to do so. They were:

*       *      *       *      *     *     *     *     *      *

Now, I still would have chastised you for naming 7 people of whom only 3 actually did the thing at issue, which was to be shown the Altgens photo and asked to identify the Doorway Man. 

But still, for the sake of your own integrity, your own character, and your own identity, you could have at least shown Viklund the spacing, the distancing that he warrants. 

I've heard of burning bridges before, but you're burning bridges to your own soul. 

This above all, James: To thine own self be true.