Thursday, October 15, 2015

Someone sent me this Allen photo, and it provides yet another image of Babushka Lady, but again, from behind. 



Do you realize how many times she was imaged? But, never her face. Always from a bad angle. 

What were the chances of that. Don't you think that in 7 or 8 random images that we'd sometimes see her face? 

The fact is that there's only ONE image in which we can see her face, but, it's fake. That is, it's not her. 



Look how small she looks. She is out of proportion with the others, isn't she? Look at the woman in front of her, and look at the man behind her. To me, she looks small. She is obviously colorized, and even her colors are wrong. Her scarf was cream-colored with purple contrast. It wasn't red.  

Let's look at her up-close.



Babushka Lady wasn't that old. She was no 17 year old, but she wasn't as old as that. And she NEVER had her scarf undone like that, and she never had her hair exposed like that. 



Again: her scarf was NEVER undone, and her hair was NEVER exposed like that. 




So, what is this picture below, and where did it come from?



It is said to be a photo taken by Cancellare, which someone colorized to imply that the scarfed woman was Babushka Lady, which she was not. 

Again: her scarf was NEVER undone like that; her hair was never exposed like that. 




So, what did they colorize her for? To mislead us? 

I propose that Babushka Lady was connected. She was part of it. And her outfit (a tight scarf and long coat) was a DISGUISE. It was designed to prevent anyone from recognizing her or identifying her. 

The Laws of Physics tell us that Babushka Lady took the Moorman photo, which was taken at an angle from behind.

Mary Moorman was facing Elm Street directly. She was facing it perpendicularly. She never turned. Mary never turned. Her picture was taken perpendicular to Elm Street. But, the Moorman photo was taken on a diagonal to Elm Street. From the Physics professor:


And what he is referring to is this diagonal line:


The fact that the line of the limo is NOT parallel with the bottom of the picture but rather is diagonal is proof that the Moorman photo was taken at a diagonal. 

If the photographer had been standing perpendicular to Elm Street (as Mary Moorman was) then the line of the limo would have been parallel with the bottom of the picture. It is not. And that means that it was taken on a diagonal. The one photographing the limo from a diagonal was Babushka Lady and only Babushka Lady. Mary Moorman did not photograph the limo on a diagonal, but rather, from perpendicular. And that proves that she, Mary Moorman, did NOT take the Moorman photo. 

Mary Moorman did NOT take the Moorman photo, and Babushka Lady did. That is now mathematically and scientifically proven. 



  

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.