Saturday, October 10, 2015

The Gorilla Lovelady clip is said to be from the Martin film, but it is never seen in it. And I have that direct from Gary Mack, alias for Larry Dunkel, the deceased former director of the Sixth Floor Museum.

Years ago, I asked Dunkel if, in the vast resources of the Sixth Floor Museum, they had a copy of the Martin film which included the Lovelady clip. He said no. I asked him where I could get it. He said nowhere. 

I asked him how it ever got separated. He didn't know. 

I asked him, then how do you really know it's from Martin? He had no answer.

But, we do know the history of that clip. It was first put forward in 1966 in response to Harold Weisberg, who was bellyaching that it was Oswald in the doorway and that Lovelady wore a short-sleeved striped shirt.

The Martin film was taken on November 22, 1963, so how come nobody noticed Lovelady in front of the TSBD minutes after the assassination before that? It was neither mentioned nor shown before 1966. And that is not credible.  It is not credible that no one noticed Lovelady in that film prior to that.

And who cuts, as in chops up, a JFK motorcade film? Jack Martin didn't do it. It wound up in FBI hands, so did they do it? And if not them, then who? And on what grounds? And by what right? 

There are three people shown in that film who could not possibly be there at the time: Billy Lovelady, Danny Arce, and Bonnie Ray Williams. And we can visibly see that the figures shown were not those persons. The Lovelady figure looks like a gorilla and not like Lovelady at all. The Danny Arce figure looks white rather than hispanic. And the Bonnie Ray Williams figure looks way too stocky. You don't see the spindlyness of the real Bonnie Ray. Plus, look how much longer his neck was on the right?


So, the Gorilla Man clip is FAKE. And there is no doubt about it. It was fabricated in order to sell the idea that Lovelady wore a plaid shirt, which he didn't. Harold was right; Lovelady wore a short-sleeved plaid one. 

Now, we have the Baker clip from Darnell, and again, it's not present in the intact film. Are you seeing a pattern here? 

Who is this figure?

It is obviously not Oswald, and it would be insane to think so. But, is it anybody? Look at the ratio of the size its head to the size of its body. Does that even fit into the category of human? 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.