Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This is to Greg Parker, the spiritual leader of the Prayermanites. 

Greg: wrap your feeble mind around this. This is from YOUR website: prayer-man.com:

So, you've got Shelley and Lovelady identified in the Malcolm Couch film. So far, so good. But, for some reason, you used an unnecessarily dark image which conceals the fact that Lovelady was wearing a short-sleeved shirt.

That's it. That's how he was. That's what he wore: a short-sleeved shirt. And it means that he didn't wear this shirt:

That shirt is long-sleeved. Unless you are going to argue that he changed his shirt, you can't say that he was Lovelady. It means that he was a Lovelady impostor. And since we can't assume that they had a Lovelady impostor there on 11/22/63, it means they made a phony film which features a Lovelady impostor.

What's the alternative, Greg? Is it not a problem for Lovelady to be wearing short-sleeves and long-sleeves on the same day at the same time?

It's short sleeves on the left, Greg. And it's long sleeves on the right. You've already pegged the guy on the left as Lovelady. And that means, ipso facto, that the guy on the right CAN'T be Lovelady. And since he occurs in a film, it means that he's a phony Lovelady occurring in a film. 

Now, that logic follows from YOUR work, from YOUR website, from YOUR claim. And that guy is not the only phony Lovelady in long sleeves.

That's long sleeves, eh? 

Long sleeves again, eh?

It's hard to see, but that's long sleeves too on the supposed Lovelady in the Hughes film.

So, we've got all these Loveladys in long sleeves when you have already admitted that he wore short sleeves, a striped short-sleeved shirt. 

It's the shirt he posed in for the FBI.

And that means that the other Loveladys must be phony, which means that there were phony films of Lovelady. And all of that follows from what YOU have posted on your site, and I mean this: