What is wrong with you, James Norwood? Have you completely lost your mind?
Buell Wesley Frazier
Sarah Stanton
Billy Lovelady
Danny Arce
Harold Norman
James Jarman, Jr.
Mrs. Donald Baker
That's a list of the people who identified Doorway Man as Billy Lovelady in the Altgens photo- according to Professor James Norwood.
Except that it's false. It's a lie! Billy Lovelady never identified the Doorway Man as himself. He merely drew an arrow to himself in the Altgens photo, and there was never any verbal distinction made of whom he drew his arrow to, except to say that it was drawn in the black. Therefore, all we can do is take out the photo and look for his arrow. And when we do, we see that he drew it to Black Hole Man. There is no other mark on the photo except for Frazier's arrow and the small discreet line on Black Hole Man's forearm.
Most of the arrow, including the head was drawn in the black space of Black Hole Man's arms, and I strongly suspect that Joseph Ball, or someone else, took the felt pen that Lovelady used to draw his arrow or one like it and smeared through the part of the arrow that was in the black. That's why all we see is the tail of the arrow on BH Man's forearm.
Now, if someone disagrees with that, their recourse is simple: find Lovelady's arrow elsewhere on the photo. In 52 years, no one has done that. However, many have lied and attributed Frazier's arrow to Lovelady.
James Jarmon Jr.? He was never shown the Altgens photo and asked to identify Doorman. Here's his testimony:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/m_j_russ/jarman.htm
Harold Norman? He was never shown the Altgens photo and asked to identify Doorman. Here's his testimony:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/m_j_russ/norman.htm
Sarah Stanton? I don't know if she even testified to the Warren Commission at all, and I have no link for her. But, she certainly wasn't shown the Altgens photo and asked to identify Doorway Man.
But yes, they did get Mrs. Donald Baker to identify Doorman as Lovelady, and I knew about her.
Mr. LIEBELER. I show you Commission Exhibit No. 203, and I call your attention to a man standing in the doorway of the Texas School Book Depository Building?
Mrs. BAKER. Yes.
Mr. LIEBELER. Do you recognize him?
Mrs. BAKER. That looks like Billy.
Mr. LIEBELER. That looks like Billy Lovelady?
Mrs. BAKER. Yes.
So, that leaves you with Frazier, Arce, and Baker, so far, James, which is 3. Hence, your claim of 7 such witnesses stands refuted.
But, why are you doing this, James? Why do you lie? You know I'm going to catch you. You know you're not going to pull any wool over my eyes. So, why do you try?
Furthermore, James, if we put aside the issue of photographic alteration, we still have this:
None of those matches depend on photographic alteration. They're there- whether the photo was altered or not. So, just forget about the issue of photographic alteration- for the time being. You still have to account for the likenesses that we see above, and I am referring to the likenesses in both the man and the clothing.
Furthermore, it's not as though you have a collage of Doorman and Lovelady that matches better. There is a reason why people like you do not post comparisons of Doorman and Lovelady- it could only hurt and not help your cause.
James, you are getting increasingly desperate; increasingly pathetic; and increasingly hopeless. You keep digging yourself in deeper as you align yourself with vile Ops, some of whom engage in criminal acts.
You? A professor? Then may Heaven help your students.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.