Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I just found out something today that floors me: there are researchers who have been claiming for years that Sirhan Sirhan was drugged with scopalamine, which is the drug I claim was given to Jack Ruby. 

One of the side effects of scopalamine is to cause pupil dilation, and we can see        that Ruby's pupils were dilated.

 

If you look closely and distinguish the black pupil from the surrounding iris, which is lighter, you can see that his pupils were hugely dilated. There is a big dilated pupil there. 

This is an interview of Sirhan Sirhan from 1989 with David Frost. I hadn't seen it before, but now I realize that the parallels between Sirhan Sirhan and Jack Ruby are even greater than I thought.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ma_RpEcm7NY&fbclid=IwAR1XRdWjmr7tDfsi03e7egAdSActFrp0xdpciXGnil7v0103qGpbRbnicI4

Sirhan was certainly more eloquent than Jack Ruby. He expressed himself very well. In the video, he sounds educated and at times lofty. Nobody could say that about Jack Ruby. 

But, like Jack Ruby, whose reason for shooting Oswald surfaced AFTER he supposedly shot him  (the 'I did it for Jackie" excuse drummed up by his lawyer , Tom Howard) the same is  true of Sirhan. When asked why he shot RFK, Sirhan said it was because RFK said he was going to sell Phantom fighter jets to Israel.    

But, just as Jackie was not going to have to return to Dallas to testify, the sale of fighter jets to Israel was not going to depend on Robert Kennedy.  There was widespread support for it in Congress and from LBJ. Look:

https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/lyndon-johnson-no-better-friend-1.6073630 

So, this was not going to depend on Robert Kennedy.  

Sirhan went on and on about how Robert Kennedy was his hero, his champion, his defender of the downtrodden. So, we are supposed to believe that one speech, reported in the newspaper, in which Kennedy endorsed something that had very widespread support        and was going to happen anyway, flipped Sirhan out? What does that remind you of? How about Lee Harvey Oswald seeing JFK's motorcade route in the newspaper (there is no evidence that he did, only a circumstance in which he might have) and getting suddenly bent on murdering him. In Oswald's case, there was no reason at all. He liked JFK; defended Kennedy; and always spoke well of him.  Of course, he denied shooting Kennedy, but there was no policy of JFK's that anyone has ever cited which enraged him. He just flipped out and decided to kill Kennedy- for no reason. That's the story.

But, back to Sirhan, Frost asked him about all the diary entries about killing RFK by June 5. Was it crazed, Frost asked?  "It must have been, obviously," Sirhan said. But, he said it like he was talking about someone else. And then, he followed it by saying that "there really was no deliberateness to the killing." And that is the parallel to Ruby because Ruby said over and over that he had no thought of shooting Oswald.                               

The impression I get from listening to Sirhan is that he no more thought of himself as being capable of murder than most of us, and  it's more that he accepts that he did it. But, he has no cognitive connection to doing it.  He has said over and over that he has no memory of doing it. 

Sirhan vehemently denied that he "was drumming towards shooting Bobby Kennedy." So, what  is the truth? I doubt that Sirhan ever wrote that stuff. I think he was shown it afterwards, and it was drummed into him that he wrote it. And he came to accept it the way Ruby accepted that he shot Oswald because he was told that he did. 

Now, as to what happened on June 5, this is where it gets weird. Sirhan said that upon leaving Bob's Big Boy burger joint, he picked up the L.A. Times, and he flipped through it to get to the Sports section, but he saw an announcement of a parade that evening to celebrate the Israeli victory in the Six Day War a year earlier. So, he decided to attend it. But, that  is weird because it  doesn't sound like something he would do alone. He was a Palestinian; he was inflamed about the Six Day War; he blamed Israel; but, would he go to a pro-Israel parade alone?  A group might but not one guy alone.  

But then, it leaves Sirhan and jumps to a narrator. And the narrator said that Sirhan "got lost" and wound up at a "storefront campaign of a local official." But, it wasn't a local official. It was Max Rafferty who was running for the Senate. And it was there, according to the narrator, that Sirhan learned about the "bigger party" at the Ambassador Hotel for RFK. 
            So, we're supposed to believe that Sirhan Sirhan knew about RFK's reference to supporting the sale of the fighter jets to Israel but not about his scheduled post-election campaign rally on the night of June 5?

But, everybody knew about it, including me. And I was there. Not on the evening of the 5th, but the night before. I, and a friend, who was also a student at UCLA, walked from Hedrick Halll, a UCLA dormitory, to the Ambassador Hotel on the evening of  June 4, just to experience the  hoopla of the preparations. It was late by the time we got there, about midnight, but it was really hopping. I still have images in my mind of all the bustle.  

So, how could someone who was obsessed with Robert Kennedy not know about it?

So, Sirhan went from the Rafferty campaign rally to the Ambassador Hotel. He said there was a lot of drinking going on, and he started drinking. Then, he said that he was "enjoying it at first, but then it ended in tragedy." When Frost asked him about the shooting, Sirhan said that he "was not in control of his senses." He said he "didn't have his wits about him" that he was disoriented, confused. What does that sound like? It sounds like he was drugged.  And it sounds like the same condition that Jack Ruby was in, where he was reported to be mumbling incoherently.  Both of these guys were drugged- drugged and helpless. 

Then, Sirhan denied being part of a conspiracy, just as Ruby did. Then Sirhan went on really big superlatives about RFK including calling him the "savior of all Mankind." But, he did not have one word to say about the actual shooting. He could not describe what happened. 


So, here is the bottom line. Both of them, Sirhan Sirhan and Jack Ruby, were drugged. Both of them were drugged and most likely with scopalamine. And both were subjected to mind control. They were both MK-ULTRA subjects. 

Now, I don't believe Sirhan Sirhan ever fired a live round. They must have had blanks in his gun. They were never going to let him actually fire. In that crowded place? They didn't need him to shoot Robert Kennedy. They had experts for that. They just needed him to take the blame for it. It was the same for Ruby. They didn't need him to shoot Oswald. They just needed him to take the blame for it. 

Here is a  quote from RFK researcher Linda Pease from A Lie Too Big To Fail: