Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I know that when people first hear me say that Jack Ruby was innocent, they recoil, but it's true. If you look closely at the Garage Shooter and compare him to Jack Ruby, you can see that they are different men. 

 So, that's the Garage Shooter on the left, with his short, burly neck, his relatively long hair that could very easily be a wig, and his very clean-shaven neck. The image on the right is from Ruby's mug shot, and you can see that his neck was longer; that his hair was tapered in back in the normal way; and that he had a lot of scruffy hair growth on his neck. There is simply no way that you can claim that those two are the same man. 

But, what about the talking points? OK, let's look at them. Didn't Ruby admit that he shot Oswald? No, Ruby just accepted that he did. He said he never had any thought or intention to shoot Oswald- the whole weekend. He said he had no awareness or memory of shooting Oswald. The sole basis for him accepting that he did it was the Dallas Police telling him that he did. But, what if they lied?

But, wasn't Jack Ruby recognized in the basement? No, he was not; not by any reporters or cameramen. Dallas Police claimed to recognize him, but they were Oswald's real killers, and they framed Ruby. The Dallas Police lied about everything, and they did shoot Oswald. They didn't shoot him in the basement- that was all theater. They shot him in the Jail Office afterwards. 

Now, I know it seems far-fetched for the Dallas Police to have done that. But, it wasn't something they did on their own. They never would have done it on their own. President Lyndon Johnson must have put them up to it. Fritz and his men were all ex-military, and LBJ was the Commander in Chief. 

Consider that Ruby told the Warren Commissioners that he sent the money wire to Karen Carlin at 10:17, which was an hour before. So, Ruby got there an hour before, and he was pounced upon then and hustled up to the 5th floor jail. There, they told him that he shot Oswald. Ruby was heavily drugged, and he was very weak mentally, and he accepted that he did it even though he hadn't the slightest memory of having done it. And he hadn't the slightest thought to do it. Most people in that situation would have been defiant, but not Ruby. He was mentally impaired. 

The Shooter was short. He was the shortest man in the garage. Look at him. Jack Ruby was 5'9" which is average height. So, how could this be Jack Ruby? 

You can see that the Shooter was shorter than Will Fritz on the left. The tallest Fritz could have been was 5'7", and the Shooter was shorter than that. Again, Ruby was 5'9". Here's another look:

That short guy could not possibly be Jack Ruby. 

Didn't Ruby say he shot Oswald to save Jackie Kennedy a trip to Dallas to testify? No. That claim was invented by Ruby's first lawyer Tom Howard. 

Didn't Ruby shoot Oswald with his middle finger, as seen in the Jackson photo?

That is a staged photo, and the reason it was staged that way is because of the erroneous belief that Ruby lost his right index finger and would have had to use his middle finger. In fact, Ruby had lost his left index finger. His right index finger was intact; so, he would have had no reason to do that. And there was no other reason for him to do it. No, it was not a Mafia practice to shoot people that way. That's just a lie. Furthermore, Jack Ruby was not in the Mafia. That too is a lie. And the Mafia had no reason whatsoever to kill Oswald. He didn't know anything about the Mafia. There was nothing he told authorities about the Mafia. It never came up. And if they had asked him, he would have asid he knew nothing about them, which he didn't. The whole Mafia claim is completely and totally unfounded. 

So, Ruby got to the basement an hour early, where he was abducted and taken up to the 5th floor, and that is where he was during the Garage Spectacle. The man impersonating him was FBI Agent James Bookhout. Here is an image of Bookhout surrounded by detectives, taken a couple minutes after the shooting. 

That is supposed to be Jack Ruby, but it's not. It is James Bookhout. They took out Bookhout's eyes and gave him black stripes instead of eeyes. Notice how we can see Detective Elmer Boyd's eyes on the left and Detective Warren Hall's eyes on the right. So, why shouldn't we see the Shooter's eyes? Why should he have black stripes instead? Then, they blurred Detective Richard Sims in back just for good measure. It is definitely not Jack Ruby. These two are not the same man. 

That man on the right is definitely FBI Agent James Bookhout. 

Note the phony eyebrows on the Young Bookhout on the left. His eyebrows were not like that, and nobody's are. That's an old CIA trick. That is the same man separated by 26 years of time. It's the same roundish face. It's the same short neck. It's the same head neck carriage; he is holding himself the same way. Again, they blackened out his eyes on the right, since he was Bookhout. They also broke his nose. But, in spite of that, that is the same man, from young to middle-aged. 

Ruby wore high-top shoes and black socks, while Bookhout wore dressy wingtips and light socks on 11/24/63.

So, they had to create the story that they changed every stitch of clothing on Ruby, including his shoes and his underwear. 

Notice that it says pair of "black les. shoes" which I presume stands  for "leisure." And it says 1 set of underwear. It is ridiculous. It was a City Jail, and prisoners don't stay there. They get promptly arraigned (which is a Constitutional right) and then they either go home or they are remanded to the County Jail. All this was damage control. 

Yes, the Dallas Police killed Oswald, and they lied through their teeth. The most vocal liar was Jim Leavelle, who said that he saw Ruby and responded by trying to jerk Oswald behind him to protect him. HE NEVER DID THAT. Then, he said that he struck Ruby on his left shoulder with his right hand, and he never did that. He just lied, lied, lied. And they lied at Ruby's trial. 

They had Tippit's partner there: Officer RC Nelson. But why? He was a field officer. He didn't work at the station. What did they need him for? I sincerely think they let him deliver the fatal shot to Oswald in the Jail Office. There was poetic justice in it, since they believed that Oswald shot Tippit. Of course, he didn't. Oswald didn't shoot anybody. I think it's very likely they found a way to sedate Oswald first. And there were silencers for 38s back in 1963. 

There is much more that I could tell you, but there is absolutely no doubt that Jack Ruby was innocent. And this was probably the greatest psy-op of all time. It was a psy-op on Ruby himself, but it was also a psy-op on everybody. They created a big false narrative giving Ruby a life of crime in the Mafia. They made him a gun runner. They claimed that he ran gun to Castro before 1959, and then after 1959, he ran guns to the anti-Castro Cubans. It's all nonsense. 

Jack Ruby was completely, totally innocent, and he knew nothing about the murders of Kennedy or Oswald. He was extremely impaired mentally, and I tell you that he was MK-ULTRA'd. He was definitely drugged, and he was probably hypnotized and subjected to other mind control techniques. They got Dr. Louis Joylan West from UCLA, the "Maestro of Mind Control" to be his doctor. They also made West Sirhan Sirhan's doctor, and Sirhan too was MK-ULTRA'd. Ruby came before Sirhan, so Ruby may be the first MK-ULTRA subject that we know of. 

Oswald had to be killed pronto- before he saw a lawyer. They couldn't let him see a laywer even once because one short visit with a lawyer was all it would have taken to convince the lawyer of his innocence. And there was no gag order, so that lawyer would have been able to go public. They simply had to kill Oswald. And no, Ruby didn't do it for them. Ruby just took the blame for them, which was all they needed him for. 

Jack Ruby, like Lee Harvey Oswald, was completely, totally innocent. The U.S. government killed both Kennedy and Oswald, and they have been lying about it for 62 years.