Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Holy Cow!  Backes actually wants to defend this photo.

Backes vouches for that photo, 100%. He has no problem with it. And, he breezes by Lady Bird's linebacker shoulders compared to LBJ's. His only complaint is that the lines aren't perfectly straight. Well, neither were LBJ's shoulders. 

He didn't mention LadyBird's man-hands compared to LBJ.

Backes doesn't have an iota of concern. It's all good to him. 

Then, Backass said that this isn't a manipulated image, that JFK was just closer to the camera. Well, since they were standing next to each other, he couldn't have been that much closer.

Oh really, Backes?

Here is one in which LBJ is clearly well behind Kennedy and farther from the camera, but still taller. 

Then Backes posted some pictures in which LBJ was sitting slumped next to his wife, where he's not much higher than she is. 

Like this one, in which he is not only slumped but leaning forward and down towards her. He is cozying up to her. People do that for photos.  

You know, Backes, it's very obvious in this picture that they are posing for the camera, and he is DELIBERATELY conforming himself to her height so that their faces would be close together. But in the image from the Nix film, LBJ was NOT posing. He was not configuring himself as a couple with her for the sake of the camera. 

He's not even turned towards her. He's turned away from her. So, you can't say he's doing the same thing there as in the picture you posted.

But, let's return to your image. Notice the relative size of their hands. 

Yeah, that makes sense, unlike this:

But, it's no problem for you either, is it, Backes? The only things that you dispute are the bus ride and the cab ride. All the JFK assassination images and all the JFK assassinations films are A-OK with you. They did not do one thing to lie about any of them. Every single image related to the JFK  assassination is pristine according to Joseph Backes. Except for one. To Joseph Backes, the ONLY false image in the whole JFK assassination is this one:

Everything else is genuine and immaculate, according to Backes. 

What I like about this whole process is that I come up with something, then Backes haplessly responds, and then I get to drive the point home with even more evidence, and all provoked by his utter stupidity. Unwittingly, the fool is helping me.