I put up this link of Baker and Truly talking about their encounter with Oswald in the lunch room, and again, I say that if you are any judge of character, if you have any good sense about people, you know that they were not lying, that they would have to be Academy Award winning actors to have said what they did in the way that they did were it not true.
Only an insane moron like Joseph Backes could watch that and say they were lying.
Furthermore, Oswald, himself, told his interrogators that it happened.
Now, why would he do that?
First of all, he was innocent. He didn't kill Kennedy, and he didn't kill Tippit. So, he had nothing to lie about. Why would you lie to police if you were innocent? I suppose you might if you were trying to protect someone else. Say, if you didn't commit a crime but you knew your son did. But, that doesn't apply here. There was nobody he had to protect.
Second, how could he possibly tell the same lie as Truly and Baker? It's not as though he conferred with them. It's not as though the three of them decided to tell the same story.
Fritz wrote down- in notes he took only for himself and told no one about or ever made public- that Oswald said he went to the 2nd floor lunch room and encountered a police officer.
Claims 2nd floor Coke when off(icer) came in.
As it turns out, that was written wrong. Both Baker and Truly (who did not know each other) said that Oswald had no Coke when they saw him. After they left, he must have gotten one because Mrs. Reid reported seeing him with a "full Coke" just seconds later.
Still, it establishes the essential truth of what happened.
And it wasn't just Fritz who wrote it down; Hosty and Bookhout, who were FBI agents, did as well.
And the idea that Fritz and Hosty and Bookhout collaborated to lie about it is ridiculous.
The framing of Oswald didn't happen the way the Idiot thinks. It's not like Fritz turned to Hosty and said, "So, how are we going to frame this guy?" I'm sure it all went down with an air of propriety with the presumption that Oswald was guilty but not that they were doing anything wrong.
And here's something interesting: In their joint statement, Hosty and Bookhout said that "Oswald claimed that he was on the first floor when President John F. Kennedy passed the building."
The first floor? The first floor is too big a space. Nobody would say that they were on the first floor. They would say where on the first floor they were. And Oswald did that. He said he was "out with Bill Shelley in front." But, Hosty and Bookhout, who heard that, rounded it off to the first floor because they didn't want to admit that Oswald made that very exculpatory statement. But, they also admitted that Oswald "frantically" denied shooting President Kennedy or Officer Tippit. They also admitted that Oswald denied ever going to Mexico except to Tijuana.
So, Oswald definitely admitted the 2nd floor encounter with Baker, thereby confirming it. The notion that he, as well as Truly and Baker, all lied about it is insane. The Idiot Backes thinks that they not only made up the lunch room encounter, and the bus ride, and the cab ride, but they concocted the idea to claim that they found this bus transfer ticket on Oswald.
All that chicanery, but every JFK image except the above one was lily white and as pure as the driven snow. Fucking idiot lives in a JFK fantasy world.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.